A divisionDivision No. 73 · Tuesday, 17 December 2024· Commons· Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Third Reading

354Ayes
202Noes
Carried · majority 152 · Government won
94 did not vote
Aye353No202DID NOT VOTE · 94

650 Members · Aye 354 · No 202 · DNV 94 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 17 December 2024 to pass the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill at its Third Reading, approving the legislation by 354 votes to 202. The bill raises the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, cuts the per-employee earnings threshold at which employers become liable from £9,100 to £5,000, and doubles the Employment Allowance from £5,000 to £10,500. All three changes take effect from 6 April 2025. The vote gives legal force to one of the largest payroll tax increases in recent memory. Employers across every sector face higher costs from spring 2025. The reduction in the secondary threshold is particularly significant because it widens the range of earnings on which contributions are due, meaning employers pay more even before the rate rise takes effect. The doubling of the Employment Allowance is designed to shield smaller employers, but critics focused on sectors that cannot easily absorb the extra costs: GP surgeries operating under NHS contracts, independent care homes, hospices reliant on charitable fundraising, and small businesses in sectors such as life sciences. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, with 312 Labour and 37 Labour and Co-operative members backing the bill and none opposing it. Conservatives (99), Liberal Democrats (70), the SNP (8), the DUP (5), the Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (3), and Reform UK (3) all voted against. The Lib Dems were particularly vocal in debate, arguing the rise would damage the very primary care and social care infrastructure the government says it wants to protect. Three independents voted aye and six voted no. The scale of the government's Commons majority meant the result was never in doubt; the bill passed comfortably despite near-total opposition from smaller parties.

Voting Aye meant
Support raising employer National Insurance contributions to fund public services, accepting the offsetting doubling of the Employment Allowance for smaller businesses
Voting No meant
Oppose the employer NI rise, arguing it damages small businesses, GPs, care homes, hospices and charities — undermining the very NHS and social care system the government claims to protect
§ 01Who voted how.556 voting Members · 94 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
312
0
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
99
17
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
69
2
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
37
0
5
Independent
3
7
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
8
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
1
0
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0