A divisionDivision No. 73 · Tuesday, 17 December 2024· Commons· Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Third Reading

354Ayes
202Noes
Carried · majority 152 · Government won
94 did not vote
Aye353No202DID NOT VOTE · 94

650 Members · Aye 354 · No 202 · DNV 94 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons passed the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill at its Third Reading on 17 December 2024, by 354 votes to 202. The Bill raises the rate of employer secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions. This was the final Commons vote before the Bill moved to the House of Lords, and it enacted one of the central revenue-raising measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. The Bill increases the cost of employing staff for every business, charity, and independent public service provider in the UK. The Government argues this is necessary to raise additional revenue, estimated at around £25 billion, to fund investment in public services including the NHS. Critics in the debate focused heavily on the impact on organisations that sit outside direct public sector employment but deliver publicly commissioned services, including GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities, and childcare providers. These organisations cannot recoup higher wage costs in the way commercial businesses might, and the debate heard estimates including a £940 million additional burden on adult social care providers, roughly £20,000 extra per GP surgery annually, and around £47,000 in additional costs per nursery. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour MPs and 37 Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted in favour. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Green, Plaid Cymru, and Reform UK MP who voted did so against, producing a combined opposition of 202 noes. Three Independents voted with the Government and seven against. The Liberal Democrats tabled amendments seeking to exempt care home operators, domiciliary care providers, and GP practices from the higher rate, and separately to create a reduced rate for registered charities, but these were rejected. The Conservatives tabled their own amendments and a new clause. The Government framed the measure as a response to what it described as a deteriorated fiscal inheritance, while opposition parties argued it broke explicit pre-election pledges not to raise National Insurance and would damage the very services the Government claimed to be protecting.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the employer National Insurance rise into law, accepting it as a necessary revenue-raising measure
Voting No meant
Oppose the employer NI increase, arguing it harms small businesses, care providers, and growth sectors like life sciences
§ 01Who voted how.556 voting Members · 94 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
312
0
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
99
17
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
70
2
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
37
0
5
Independent
3
6
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
8
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
1
0
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0