Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 30

Tuesday, 11 March 2025 · Division No. 115 · Commons

189Ayes
324Noes
Defeated

133 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Employment Rights Reform(No)Opposition To Labour Employment Bill(Yes)Gig Economy Regulation(Yes)Pro Workers Rights(No)

Voting Yes means

Support adding New Clause 30 to the Employment Rights Bill, backing the opposition's proposed change to the legislation

Voting No means

Reject the opposition's New Clause 30, backing the government's Employment Rights Bill as it stands

Parliament voted on 11 March 2025 on New Clause 30, an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill at Report Stage (the stage where the full House of Commons examines a bill after committee scrutiny and can propose further changes). The amendment was defeated by 324 votes to 189. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted opposed the new clause, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, and most voting independents all supported it.

The Employment Rights Bill is the government's flagship legislation to expand workplace protections, covering areas including zero-hours contracts, fire and rehire practices, day-one unfair dismissal rights, flexible working, and trade union recognition. New Clause 30 was one of many amendments tabled at Report Stage seeking to add further provisions to the Bill. By voting it down, the government kept the Bill within its own defined scope and resisted changes it had not itself proposed. The wider Bill, supported by the government, is intended to benefit millions of workers across the country, including those on precarious contracts, pregnant workers, and low-paid employees receiving statutory sick pay for the first time.

The vote produced an unusual cross-party alliance in the Aye lobby, with opposition parties spanning the political spectrum from the Conservatives to Reform UK to the Greens all voting together against the government. No Labour MP voted for the new clause. This pattern reflects less a shared policy vision among the Ayes and more a tactical convergence of parties, each with different objections to or ambitions for the Bill, voting against the government's position. The broader legislative context includes parallel controversy over the government's increase in employer National Insurance contributions, which critics argue compounds the costs imposed on businesses by the Employment Rights Bill itself.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/291 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
7 Aye/2 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9 Aye/0 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Gregory Stafford

Conservative · Farnham and Bordon

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.

Voted Aye

Aphra Brandreth

Conservative · Chester South and Eddisbury

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.

Voted Aye

Nick Timothy

Conservative · West Suffolk

Questioning

Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.

Voted Aye

Steve Witherden

Labour · Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr

Supportive

Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.

Voted No

Sarah Russell

Labour · Congleton

Supportive

Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.

Voted No

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Supportive

Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.

Voted No

Imran Hussain

Labour · Bradford East

Supportive

Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.

Voted No

Related Votes

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 30 — Tuesday, 11 March 2025 | Beyond The Vote