National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 8B
313Ayes
194Noes
Carried · majority 119 · Government won138 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 313 · No 194 · DNV 138 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted 313 to 194 on 25 March 2025 to reject Lords Amendment 8B to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The amendment would have given the government powers to exempt hospices, GP practices, NHS-commissioned dentists, pharmacists, and charitable health and care providers from the employer National Insurance rise. By passing the motion to disagree, MPs blocked that exemption from becoming law, keeping the NI increase universal. The vote matters because it determines whether organisations such as hospices and charitable care providers face the full impact of the employer NI rise taking effect from 6 April 2025. The Bill increases the employer NI rate from 13.8% to 15% and lowers the threshold at which employers become liable from £9,100 to £5,000 a year. Conservative shadow minister Gareth Davies cited Hospice UK warnings that the change could cost the hospice sector up to £30 million a year, with individual organisations like St Barnabas hospice in Lincolnshire facing costs running into hundreds of thousands of pounds. The government argued that publicly funded employers would receive direct support, as has been the standard approach with previous NI changes, and pointed to a separate £100 million capital fund and £26 million revenue grant for the hospice sector. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour of rejecting the Lords amendment, with 279 Labour and 32 Labour and Co-operative Party members voting Aye and none voting No. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, DUP, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and Green MP who voted went into the No lobby. Two independents voted Aye and four voted No. The vote is part of a prolonged back-and-forth between the Commons and the Lords over the Bill, with the Lords having returned similar amendments more than once and the Commons disagreeing on each occasion. A parallel division on Amendment 1B, held the same day, produced a nearly identical result of 312 to 190.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government rejecting Lords exemptions for hospices and health and care charities, keeping the employer NI rise universal to protect tax revenues
Voting No meant
Back the Lords amendment giving powers to exempt hospices, GP practices, pharmacists and charitable care providers from the employer NI increase, arguing the tax threatens vulnerable services
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
279
0
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
99
17
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
64
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
—
2
5
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
9
0
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
2
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government must reject amendments 1B, 5B, 8B and 21B as they undermine £24bn funding target; exemptions would require higher borrowing, lower spending or other tax rises; approach mirrors Conservative health and social care levy policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,713 words) →
Amendments essential to protect hospices facing £30m annual cost, children's hospices facing £5m combined cost, and smallest businesses already hit by business rates cuts and Employment Rights Bill red tape.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,943 words) →
Henry VIII powers in amendments would allow government to exempt health and care providers when growth materializes; capital funding for hospices is insufficient; amendment 8B should empower exemption of small businesses.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,137 words) →
Bill directly taxes jobs in hospices and care sector; government claim of compensation is illusory; hospice care is integral to NHS and should be treated as such; staff reduction is inevitable.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (587 words) →
Social care, GP, pharmacy and hospice sectors cannot diversify or raise prices; government's £24bn fiscal drag produces only £10bn net benefit and would fall to £8bn if proper exemptions granted; this represents catastrophic policy misadventure.Scottish National Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,046 words) →
Inconsistency: NHS England exempted but NHS GPs, dentists not; unclear why public body gets exemption while contractors delivering same services do not.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,136 words) →
Government's exemption of NHS proves it understands the damage to healthcare; deliberate decision to penalize hospices; perverse that assisted dying funding may come from taxation of palliative care.Conservative · Voted teller_no · Read full speech (469 words) →
St Barnabas hospice in Lincoln losing £300,000 annually; government health settlement does not compensate; contradicts commitment to palliative care expressed in assisted dying debates.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (86 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0