A divisionDivision No. 160 · Monday, 31 March 2025· Commons· Business

Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E

302Ayes
167Noes
Carried · majority 135 · Government won
176 did not vote
Aye305No168DID NOT VOTE · 176

645 Members · Aye 302 · No 167 · DNV 176 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 31 March 2025, the House of Commons voted by 302 to 167 to reject four amendments (15B, 15C, 15D, and 15E) that the House of Lords had made to the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill. The Lords amendments would have weakened or delayed the bill's provisions increasing business rates for private schools. By voting to disagree with these amendments, the Commons insisted on the government's original approach. The bill removes the business rates relief that independent schools in England have historically received as charitable organisations. By rejecting the Lords amendments, the Commons cleared the way for private schools to pay the full standard business rates multiplier, effectively increasing their property tax burden. The government has argued this raises revenue for state education. Private schools and their supporters contend the costs will be passed on to parents through fee increases, potentially pushing some pupils into the state sector. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 299 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government, joined by all three Greens and three independents. All 92 Conservatives, all 63 Liberal Democrats, all five Reform UK members, and the four Democratic Unionist Party members who voted opposed it, supporting the Lords amendments. This is a notable instance of the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives voting together to protect private school tax relief, a position the government has sought to frame as defending privilege. The Lords' resistance represents one of the more prominent uses of the revising chamber's powers against this government's tax agenda.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government rejecting the Lords amendments, keeping the Bill as the Commons originally passed it — including permanent lower rates for retail, hospitality and leisure and removing private school business rates relief
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendments, opposing the government's approach to business rates — particularly the removal of relief from private schools and the structure of the new multiplier system
§ 01Who voted how.469 voting Members · 176 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
264
0
97
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
92
24
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
35
0
7
Independent
3
1
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.5 principal speakers
Jim McMahonSupportiveOldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Government must reject Lords amendments as they duplicate existing powers and undermine the funding mechanism for permanent RHL relief; the higher multiplier on 1% of properties is necessary and sustainable.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,990 words)
Kevin HollinrakeOpposedThirsk and Malton
Lords amendments should be accepted; the £500,000 threshold is a blunt instrument that punishes aspiration, harms healthcare, retailers and high streets, and creates unfair cliff-edge effects for growing businesses.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (927 words)
Vikki SladeNeutralMid Dorset and North Poole
Support business rates reform but concerned about hospitals and businesses near the threshold being caught; private schools should not be taxed on education.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (575 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Opposes removal of charitable relief from private and faith schools as it unfairly disadvantages parents seeking faith-based education and disproportionately affects faith communities.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,130 words)
Robin SwannQuestioningSouth Antrim
Questions the disjointed approach of funding NHS while simultaneously taxing health services through business rates.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (62 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0