A divisionDivision No. 214 · Wednesday, 4 June 2025· Commons· Business

Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords]: Third Reading

264Ayes
99Noes
Carried · majority 165 · Government won
275 did not vote
Aye274No100DID NOT VOTE · 275

638 Members · Aye 264 · No 99 · DNV 275 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted 264 to 99 on 4 June 2025 to pass the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at Third Reading, its final stage in the House of Commons. The Bill now moves on for further parliamentary consideration. The result was never seriously in doubt given the government's majority, but the debate preceding the vote included discussion of two new clauses: one calling on the government to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics, and one requiring supermarkets to disclose so-called shrinkflation to customers. The Bill establishes a framework for product standards and consumer protection regulation in the UK after Brexit. Its passage through the Commons reflects the government's intention to set a domestic regime for how goods are regulated and measured. The ceramics new clause, though withdrawn as a probing amendment, raised a practical concern affecting manufacturers: that products fired overseas and only finished in the UK are being sold with markings suggesting full British manufacture, potentially misleading consumers and undermining genuinely domestic producers. Labour and its Co-operative Party colleagues voted unanimously in favour, providing the 264 ayes alongside a small number of independents, Green Party MPs and representatives from Plaid Cymru and the SDLP. All 89 Conservative MPs who voted opposed the Bill, joined by 6 Reform UK MPs, 1 DUP member and 1 Traditional Unionist Voice MP. No Conservative or Reform MP voted aye. Large numbers of MPs across parties had no vote recorded.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill, backing the government's framework for product standards and consumer protection regulation
Voting No meant
Oppose passing the Bill in its current form, reflecting Conservative concerns about the legislation's scope or its alignment with post-Brexit regulatory autonomy
§ 01Who voted how.363 voting Members · 275 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
238
0
123
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
25
0
17
Independent
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Supports New Clause 1 to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics to protect UK manufacturers from counterfeit products and unfair competition, particularly from Chinese copies.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,601 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Opposed to the Bill's core structure; argues clause 2(7) enables unconstitutional dynamic alignment with EU law without parliamentary oversight, effectively sabotaging Brexit and reducing the Commons to a rubber-stamp body.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,283 words)
Adam ThompsonSupportiveErewash
Defends the Bill's grant of Henry VIII powers as necessary for the UK to maintain scientific and regulatory leadership; rejects concerns about EU alignment as stemming from misunderstanding metrology and standards frameworks.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,685 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Supports the Bill as salvage operation post-Brexit but backs New Clause 15 to establish a parliamentary committee to scrutinise EU-derived regulations, arguing the volume of technical complexity requires dedicated expert oversight.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,013 words)
Richard HoldenQuestioningBasildon and Billericay
Questions the Bill's concentration of power in the Executive; supports Opposition amendments (including amendment 13) requiring parliamentary statements before alignment with foreign law, to protect SMEs from rapid regulatory change.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (490 words)
Dr Allison GardnerSupportiveStoke-on-Trent South
Strongly supports New Clause 1 to protect Staffordshire ceramics industry from cheap imports falsely marketed as British-made, citing the sector's heritage and need for fair competition.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (799 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0