Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords]: New Clause 3
88Ayes
212Noes
Defeated · majority 124 · Government won345 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 88 · No 212 · DNV 345 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 24 April 2025 on New Clause 3 to the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill, a Liberal Democrat amendment that would have barred the largest banks from accessing the Bill's new emergency recapitalisation mechanism unless the Chancellor explicitly authorised it through a statutory instrument. The amendment was defeated by 212 votes to 88, with the government opposing it. The Bill creates a new tool allowing the Bank of England to direct the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to fund the recapitalisation of a failing bank, with costs recovered through a levy on the wider banking sector. The Liberal Democrats argued that without their amendment, the mechanism could in principle be applied to large high street banks, passing the cost of a bailout onto other banks and ultimately consumers. Their amendment would have limited access to the mechanism to smaller banks by excluding institutions that hold end-state MREL (the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities, a reserve that large banks must maintain to absorb losses in a crisis). Labour MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Democratic Unionist Party voted for it. The Conservatives supported the principle of restricting the mechanism to smaller banks but opposed the Liberal Democrat's chosen method, a statutory instrument subject to the negative procedure, arguing it could create market uncertainty in a crisis. No Labour or Labour and Co-operative MPs voted in favour, and a large number of MPs across all parties had no vote recorded.
Voting Aye meant
Support limiting the new bank recapitalisation mechanism to small and medium-sized banks, preventing large banks from accessing FSCS-funded bailouts without explicit parliamentary-approved authorisation from the Chancellor.
Voting No meant
Oppose restricting the mechanism's scope, arguing the Bank of England and Treasury need maximum flexibility to act within hours during a banking crisis, and that requiring a statutory instrument could create dangerous market uncertainty.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
196
165
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
63
0
53
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
18
0
53
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
17
25
Independent
—
2
0
11
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
—
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
—
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports the Bill's overall aims but proposes amendments to limit the recapitalisation mechanism to small banks outside MREL, protect mutuals from demutualisation, and require a report on credit union resolution frameworks.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,226 words) →
Defends the Bill's flexibility and scope, arguing that statutory restrictions on the Bank of England's powers would hamper crisis response and that existing safeguards are sufficient; opposes all three main amendments.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,580 words) →
Emphasises the 2008 financial crisis lessons requiring speed and flexibility; strongly opposes amendments 1, 3, and 4 as impractical restrictions that would slow crisis resolution and increase costs.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,800 words) →
Supports amendments 3 and 4 to restrict the mechanism to small/medium banks and require consideration of competitiveness and growth impacts before using the levy.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (366 words) →
Chairs the debate and manages scope; reminds speakers to focus on amendments under discussion rather than broader related issues.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (647 words) →
Supports credit unions; raises concern that bank executives retain bonuses during crises while pensioners suffer, questioning whether legislation protects against executive compensation.Democratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (201 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0