Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025
Wednesday, 2 July 2025 · Division No. 249 · Commons
233 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support introducing regulations restricting foreign state ownership of British newspapers to protect press freedom and media independence
Voting No means
Oppose these specific regulations, arguing the 15% non-cumulative foreign ownership threshold is too high and fails to adequately protect British journalism from foreign state influence
What happened: On 2 July 2025, the House of Commons voted on the Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025. The regulations passed by 338 ayes to 79 noes. The vote approves secondary legislation (rules made under an existing Act rather than a new bill) that extends government powers to scrutinise and potentially block mergers where a foreign power seeks to acquire a stake in a UK newspaper business.
Why it matters: The regulations create new mechanisms for ministers to intervene when a foreign state, or an entity connected to one, attempts to take a controlling or significant interest in a British newspaper. This directly affects how UK media ownership is regulated, adding a national security layer to the existing competition and public interest framework under the Enterprise Act 2002. In practical terms, any future transaction involving a foreign power and a UK newspaper title could trigger a government review, with the ability to block the deal if ministers judge it a threat to press independence or national security. The regulations do not affect existing ownership arrangements but apply to future mergers.
The politics: The vote produced an unusual cross-party pattern. Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, carrying the government to a comfortable majority. However, the Liberal Democrats voted solidly against, as did Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Ulster Unionist Party, and most Greens, suggesting the opposition was not ideologically uniform and may have reflected concerns about government overreach or the scope of the powers rather than straightforward free-market objections. The Conservatives, despite being the largest opposition party, were almost entirely absent, with only two voting no and 114 not participating, making their collective position unclear. Reform UK split three to one in favour. The regulations sit in a broader political context of heightened concern about foreign influence in British institutions, though the cross-cutting nature of the opposition vote signals that unease about the specific design of these powers extended well beyond traditional free-market conservatism.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
Related Votes
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 8
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 46
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 48
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 49
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 60
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 61
15 Sept 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 62
15 Sept 2025
Opposition day: Hospitality sector
3 Sept 2025
Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025
16 Jul 2025