A divisionDivision No. 249 · Wednesday, 2 July 2025· Commons· Economy

Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025

338Ayes
79Noes
Carried · majority 259 · Government won
233 did not vote
Aye337No79DID NOT VOTE · 233

650 Members · Aye 338 · No 79 · DNV 233 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs approved regulations on 2 July 2025 barring foreign states from acquiring controlling stakes in British newspapers and news periodicals, with the vote passing 338 to 79. The rules, introduced by the government under the Enterprise Act 2002, set a 15% threshold below which state-owned investment vehicles may hold shares in a UK newspaper enterprise without automatically triggering the new merger control regime. Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour; the Liberal Democrats provided the bulk of the opposition. The regulations matter because they put flesh on a legal framework created by the previous Conservative government through the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, which amended the Enterprise Act 2002 to create a specific foreign state influence merger regime for UK newspapers and news periodicals. The practical effect is that any foreign state seeking to acquire a stake large enough to give it control or influence over a UK newspaper will face scrutiny under competition law. The 15% threshold is designed to leave room for legitimate investment by state-owned vehicles, such as sovereign wealth funds, without allowing a single foreign government to accumulate a position sufficient to direct editorial policy. Labour MPs backed the government without dissent. The Liberal Democrats, with 62 of their 72 MPs voting against, formed the core of the opposition, joined by Plaid Cymru, the DUP, the Greens, and most Conservatives who voted. The Conservative front bench indicated broad support for the policy goal while seeking reassurances. The Liberal Democrats argued the 15% threshold was too permissive. Notably, 116 Conservative MPs had no vote recorded, making the party's effective position difficult to read.

Voting Aye meant
Support new rules restricting foreign state ownership of British newspapers, accepting the government's 15% investment threshold as a balance between press independence and the newspaper industry's ability to raise capital
Voting No meant
Oppose the regulations as drafted, arguing the 15% threshold is too permissive and could allow cumulative foreign state influence over British journalism through multiple state-owned investors each holding stakes below the limit
§ 01Who voted how.417 voting Members · 233 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
292
0
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
2
114
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
61
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
35
0
7
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
1
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Stephanie PeacockSupportiveBarnsley South
The 15% threshold for passive state-owned investment is an effective and proportionate balance between protecting UK press freedom from foreign state control and enabling UK newspapers to access vital investment capital.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,380 words)
Saqib BhattiQuestioningMeriden and Solihull East
While supporting the foreign state influence regime, expresses serious concerns that multiple states could each acquire 15% stakes collectively threatening press independence, and demands cast-iron guarantees and robust safeguards in secondary legislation.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,169 words)
Max WilkinsonOpposedCheltenham
The 15% non-cumulative threshold is insufficient and opens the door to foreign state influence over British journalism; foreign states should be barred entirely from owning any part of the UK news media ecosystem.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (471 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0