Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
326Ayes
160Noes
Carried · majority 166 · Government won157 did not vote
643 Members · Aye 326 · No 160 · DNV 157 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 15 September 2025 to disagree with Amendment 1 made by the House of Lords to the Employment Rights Bill. The motion passed by 326 votes to 160, meaning MPs rejected the Lords' modification and sided with the government's original version of the legislation. This vote is part of the parliamentary process known as "ping-pong," in which a bill passes back and forth between the Commons and the Lords until both chambers agree on its final text. By voting to disagree with Lords Amendment 1, the Commons sent the bill back to the Lords with that amendment removed. The Employment Rights Bill represents a substantial overhaul of workplace legislation, covering areas such as trade union rights, zero-hours contracts, and unfair dismissal protections. The outcome of this vote means the government's preferred version of the relevant provision moves forward, rather than the modified text the Lords had inserted. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 275 voting Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs backed the government, joined by SNP members, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against. The Liberal Democrats' decision to vote with the Conservatives and Reform UK against the government position reflects the opposition's shared interest in preserving the Lords' amendment rather than any broader ideological alignment. The Employment Rights Bill has been a major legislative priority for the Labour government and has attracted sustained opposition, with related votes in December 2025 showing similar margins and party alignments, suggesting the ping-pong process has been prolonged and contested.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government in overriding the Lords amendments, backing the Employment Rights Bill as the government intends it, including rejecting Lords amendment 1's proposed flexibility changes and other Lords modifications
Voting No meant
Back the Lords amendments, arguing they improve the Bill by adding flexibility for workers — including disabled people — and other refinements, rather than accepting the government's version
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
275
0
86
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
85
31
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
66
6
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
—
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
2
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government will reject most Lords amendments and proceed with day-one unfair dismissal rights, employer-led guaranteed hours offers, and expanded bereavement leave, striking a balance between worker protection and business flexibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (7,412 words) →
The Bill will damage growth and employment; Lords amendments are reasonable and should be accepted, especially on probation periods (6 months instead of day one), zero-hours contract flexibility, and trade union ballot thresholds.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,054 words) →
The Bill is landmark legislation delivering on Labour's manifesto; day-one unfair dismissal rights and employer-led guaranteed hours are essential to restore dignity at work and end the race to the bottom.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,898 words) →
Support Bill's aims but concerned about implementation detail left to secondary legislation; favour Lords amendments on guaranteed hours as a right to request (not obligation), 48-hour notice periods, and seasonal work protections.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,716 words) →
Challenge Government on business support; claim most small and medium-sized businesses oppose the Bill despite Government assertions.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (54 words) →
Acknowledge some business concerns on probation tribunal involvement and sick pay waiting days; urge continued engagement with chambers of commerce.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (129 words) →
Small businesses fear sickness absence costs will rise dramatically; request assurance that Bill will not overwhelm businesses with additional payroll costs.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (141 words) →
Welcome most of Bill but urge Government to reconsider Lords amendment 61 on heritage railways to allow youth volunteering safely and legally.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0