Budget Resolution No. 5: Income tax (savings rate for future years)
369Ayes
166Noes
Carried · majority 203 · Government won117 did not vote
652 Members · Aye 369 · No 166 · DNV 117 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament approved Budget Resolution No. 5 on 2 December 2025, setting the savings rate of income tax for future years. The vote passed by 369 ayes to 166 noes. Budget resolutions are the formal mechanism by which Parliament gives legal effect to tax measures announced in the Chancellor's Budget statement. The savings rate of income tax applies to savings income such as interest earned on bank and building society accounts. By passing this resolution, Parliament authorises the government to apply this rate in future tax years. The resolution does not take final legislative effect until incorporated into a Finance Bill, but it provides the legal authority for the rate to operate in the interim period after a Budget statement. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, providing the core of the 369 ayes. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against, together accounting for the bulk of the 166 noes. Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and several independents supported the resolution. No Conservative or Liberal Democrat MP voted aye. The vote reflects the standard Budget approval process, in which the opposition parties use resolutions as an opportunity to register opposition to the government's fiscal package as a whole rather than to the specific tax rate in isolation.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's proposed income tax savings rate as part of the Budget package
Voting No meant
Oppose the government's proposed income tax savings rate, either as a rejection of the specific measure or the Budget as a whole
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
308
0
53
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
59
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
39
0
3
Independent
—
8
4
1
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Budget is morally necessary investment to lift children from poverty, rebuild NHS as public service, and tackle public health crisis; lifting two-child cap is paid for by tax avoidance crackdowns and gambling tax.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,668 words) →
Budget is a tax grab on working people without real reform plan; NHS waiting lists falling far too slowly; government failed to resolve strikes and has no credible social care strategy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,779 words) →
Budget treads water on NHS; unclear how medicine price increases and reorganisation costs will be paid; calls for EU customs union and better GP access rather than tax rises.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,898 words) →
Budget is progressive and fair; lifting two-child cap will reduce child poverty by 500,000; tax reforms on wealthy and investment in employment support are sound policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (917 words) →
NHS frontline staff at St Thomas' hospital deserve recognition for managing through strikes; government must prevent further strike action.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (89 words) →
Budget lacks growth measures and imposes stealth taxes on working people; freeze on income tax thresholds and EV tax burden rural constituencies disproportionately.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words) →
Strongly defends two-child cap removal as moral imperative; criticizes Opposition for opposing child poverty relief despite UK being wealthy nation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (543 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0