A divisionDivision No. 383 · Monday, 8 December 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 48B but to propose Government amendment (a) and (b) in lieu of LA48B

395Ayes
98Noes
Carried · majority 297 · Government won
155 did not vote
Aye394No100DID NOT VOTE · 155

648 Members · Aye 395 · No 98 · DNV 155 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 8 December 2025 to reject Lords amendment 48B to the Employment Rights Bill and replace it with the government's own substitute provisions, amendments (a) and (b) in lieu. The motion passed by 395 votes to 98. Lords amendment 48B would have required formal consultation with businesses and bodies representing seasonal workers before secondary legislation under the Bill was made; the government proposed its own replacement text, arguing it addressed the same concern by a different route. The vote is one stage in a prolonged exchange between the Commons and Lords over the Employment Rights Bill, a wide-ranging measure that introduces day-one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed-hours contracts for zero and low-hours workers, expanded trade union rights, and a new Fair Work Agency, among other changes. The specific question of seasonal workers matters to sectors including farming, agriculture, and hospitality, which depend on flexible recruitment at particular times of year. Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney, speaking in the debate, said she was glad the government had made progress on the seasonal work question and indicated her party's willingness to support the outcome, while calling for greater transparency on other aspects of zero-hours contract provisions. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 311 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government motion; so did 64 Liberal Democrats, six SNP members, four Plaid Cymru, and four Greens. All 85 Conservatives who voted opposed it, joined by four DUP members, three Reform UK members, and four independents. No Labour MP voted against. The Employment Rights Bill has completed its parliamentary passage following this and related Lords amendments consideration, receiving Royal Assent to become the Employment Rights Act 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's alternative provisions in place of the Lords amendment on seasonal worker consultation, accepting the government's revised approach as sufficient protection for seasonal industries such as farming and hospitality.
Voting No meant
Prefer the Lords amendment 48B as originally passed, or oppose the overall direction of the Employment Rights Bill and its approach to worker protections and trade union rights.
§ 01Who voted how.493 voting Members · 155 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
281
0
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
85
31
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
6
0
3
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Kate DeardenSupportiveHalifax
Supports the government amendments as a balanced negotiated compromise between unions and businesses that will bring the Bill into law, with unfair dismissal protection from 6 months qualifying period from January 2027.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,758 words)
Andrew GriffithOpposedArundel and South Downs
Opposes the Bill as a 'charter for jobless generation' that will destroy youth employment, increase union power through automatic political fund deductions and repealed strike ballot thresholds, and remove compensation caps without impact assessment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (975 words)
Angela RaynerSupportiveAshton-under-Lyne
Strongly supports the Bill as fulfilling a manifesto mandate and delivering job security, particularly for zero-hours contract workers; welcomes the compromise on timing and urges the Lords not to further obstruct.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (782 words)
Sarah OlneyNeutralRichmond Park
Welcomes the 6-month compromise but opposes the removal of the compensation cap as unilaterally sprung on stakeholders without consultation, and will abstain rather than support the motion.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,969 words)
Andy McDonaldOpposedMiddlesbrough and Thornaby East
Opposes the compromise as a betrayal of the day-one unfair dismissal pledge; argues 6 months still allows unfair dismissal and will weaken protections for young, ethnic minority, and disabled workers.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (777 words)
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports the Bill pragmatically as the best available outcome despite losing day-one rights; urges swift passage and warns Lords against further obstruction.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,237 words)
Antonia BanceSupportiveTipton and Wednesbury
Supports the amendments as a negotiated deal reflecting constructive union-business dialogue; argues the 6-month change will benefit 6.35 million workers and removing the cap ensures proper compensation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (720 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0