A divisionDivision No. 270 · Wednesday, 16 July 2025· Commons· Business

Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025

334Ayes
54Noes
Carried · majority 280 · Government won
262 did not vote
Aye333No54DID NOT VOTE · 262

650 Members · Aye 334 · No 54 · DNV 262 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 16 July 2025 to approve the Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025, one of two statutory instruments updating media merger rules to bring major online news publishers within the scope of public interest scrutiny for the first time. The order passed by 334 votes to 54. It works alongside a companion order, the Enterprise Act 2002 (Amendment of Section 58 Considerations) Order 2025, which passed on the same day by 333 to 54. The orders update powers originally set out in the Enterprise Act 2002, which previously allowed the Secretary of State to intervene in mergers involving only print newspapers and broadcasters. Under the new rules, significant online news publishers can also be examined on public interest grounds, including the accurate presentation of news and free expression of opinion. The change reflects a shift in news consumption: a 2024 report found that 71 per cent of UK adults now get news from online sources. The practical effect is that the government can scrutinise mergers involving large digital news outlets in the same way it has been able to scrutinise print and broadcast mergers for over two decades. Labour and its Co-operative partners voted unanimously in favour. The Liberal Democrats voted against in large numbers, with 49 of their MPs in the no lobby. Most Conservative MPs had no vote recorded, with only three voting against. Reform UK, the Greens, the DUP and several smaller parties all voted with the government.

Voting Aye meant
Support updating media merger oversight to cover major online news publishers, reflecting the shift in how people consume news and protecting press plurality in the digital age.
Voting No meant
Oppose or seek to delay the orders, with concerns that the measures fall short of Ofcom's fuller recommendations and do not adequately address risks from foreign government ownership of UK news media.
§ 01Who voted how.388 voting Members · 262 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
285
0
76
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
113
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
48
23
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
1
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Stephanie PeacockSupportiveBarnsley South
Supports the orders as necessary modernisation of media rules to reflect 71% online news consumption, balancing public interest protections with supporting sustainable press investment.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,268 words)
Stuart AndrewQuestioningDaventry
Welcomes the orders in principle but questions whether they go far enough given Ofcom's broader 2021 recommendations, and expresses concern about the foreign state ownership regime's cumulative ownership gap.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (550 words)
Max WilkinsonOpposedCheltenham
Opposes the orders in context of the recent 15% foreign government ownership cap in media, arguing it inadequately protects editorial independence and leaves grey areas on cumulative state ownership.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (443 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0