A divisionDivision No. 270 · Wednesday, 16 July 2025· Commons· Business

Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025

334Ayes
54Noes
Carried · majority 280 · Government won
262 did not vote
Aye333No54DID NOT VOTE · 262

650 Members · Aye 334 · No 54 · DNV 262 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 16 July 2025 to approve the Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025, a statutory instrument (a form of secondary legislation made under powers granted by an existing Act) that updates the legal definition of what counts as a "newspaper" for the purposes of media ownership and merger rules. The motion passed by 334 votes to 54. The Enterprise Act 2002 sets out rules governing how media mergers are assessed, including special public interest considerations that apply specifically to newspapers. By updating the statutory definition of "newspaper," this order determines which publications fall within the scope of those rules, with direct consequences for how regulators and ministers treat acquisitions and ownership changes in the press sector. A broader definition could bring more digital and online publications into the regulatory framework, while a narrower one could leave new forms of journalism outside the protections designed to preserve media plurality and competition. The vote divided largely along party lines in an unusual way. Labour and its Co-operative partners, along with several smaller parties including Reform UK, the Greens, the DUP and the Ulster Unionists, voted in favour. The Liberal Democrats provided the overwhelming bulk of the opposition, with 49 of their MPs voting no, making them the defining voice against the order. Only three Conservatives voted, all in opposition, though over 100 Conservative MPs were absent. The vote sits within a broader cluster of related divisions on media merger law, including a same-day vote on a companion order and an earlier July vote on rules covering newspaper mergers involving foreign powers, suggesting the government is pursuing a coordinated legislative update to the media ownership framework.

Voting Aye meant
Support modernising media merger rules to cover online-only news publishers, protecting plurality and diversity in the digital news landscape
Voting No meant
Oppose or express concern about this order, potentially citing worries about broader media ownership rules, including a separate SI permitting up to 15% foreign government ownership of UK newspapers
§ 01Who voted how.388 voting Members · 262 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
285
0
76
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
113
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
49
23
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
1
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0