A divisionDivision No. 211 · Wednesday, 4 June 2025· Commons· Business

Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4

171Ayes
274Noes
Defeated · majority 103 · Government won
202 did not vote
Aye172No275DID NOT VOTE · 202

647 Members · Aye 171 · No 274 · DNV 202 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 4 June 2025 on New Clause 4, an opposition amendment to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at Report Stage (the stage where MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill before its final reading). The amendment, which sought to add stronger requirements around product standards and regulatory safeguards to the bill, was defeated by 274 votes to 171. The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill sets the framework for how goods sold in the UK are regulated for safety and accuracy following the country's departure from EU product standards regimes. New Clause 4 would have added additional obligations or protections to this framework, shaping requirements that affect manufacturers, retailers, and consumers across the UK market. Its defeat means the government's original approach to product regulation remains intact, without the additional requirements the opposition sought to introduce. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 273 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives (90), Liberal Democrats (60), Reform UK (8), Greens (4), and several smaller parties all voted in favour. Two Independents voted with the government against the amendment. There were no notable cross-party rebellions within the governing Labour bloc. The result reflects the government's comfortable working majority at this stage of the bill's passage through the Commons.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring country-of-manufacture labelling on products sold in the UK, to help consumers choose British-made goods and protect domestic manufacturing industries
Voting No meant
Oppose mandatory country-of-manufacture labelling, likely citing regulatory burden on businesses or preferring a more flexible approach
§ 01Who voted how.445 voting Members · 202 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
244
117
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
3
2
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
8
0
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Supports New Clause 1 to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics to protect UK manufacturers from counterfeit products and unfair competition, particularly from Chinese copies.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,601 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Opposed to the Bill's core structure; argues clause 2(7) enables unconstitutional dynamic alignment with EU law without parliamentary oversight, effectively sabotaging Brexit and reducing the Commons to a rubber-stamp body.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,283 words)
Adam ThompsonSupportiveErewash
Defends the Bill's grant of Henry VIII powers as necessary for the UK to maintain scientific and regulatory leadership; rejects concerns about EU alignment as stemming from misunderstanding metrology and standards frameworks.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,685 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Supports the Bill as salvage operation post-Brexit but backs New Clause 15 to establish a parliamentary committee to scrutinise EU-derived regulations, arguing the volume of technical complexity requires dedicated expert oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,013 words)
Richard HoldenQuestioningBasildon and Billericay
Questions the Bill's concentration of power in the Executive; supports Opposition amendments (including amendment 13) requiring parliamentary statements before alignment with foreign law, to protect SMEs from rapid regulatory change.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (490 words)
Dr Allison GardnerSupportiveStoke-on-Trent South
Strongly supports New Clause 1 to protect Staffordshire ceramics industry from cheap imports falsely marketed as British-made, citing the sector's heritage and need for fair competition.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (799 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0