Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords]: Amendment 2
89Ayes
230Noes
Defeated · majority 141 · Government won345 did not vote
664 Members · Aye 89 · No 230 · DNV 345 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 24 April 2025 to reject Amendment 2 to the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill, which would have required the government's code of practice to include specific guidance on how the Bank of England should handle the resolution of building societies, particularly where using its new recapitalisation powers might result in demutualisation. The amendment also sought to require the Bank of England to consider finding a buyer from the mutual sector before proceeding with any demutualisation. The vote fell 89 in favour to 230 against, defeating the amendment. The practical effect of the defeat is that the code of practice accompanying the Bill will not be statutorily required to address the specific circumstances of building society resolutions or the protection of mutual structures. Because building societies have no shares, applying the recapitalisation power to one would necessarily require demutualisation, converting a member-owned institution into a shareholder-owned one. Without the guidance the amendment sought, the Bank of England retains discretion over how it weighs the interests of building society members and the mutual sector when exercising its resolution powers during a crisis. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 198 Labour MPs and 17 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 60 voting Conservatives and all 19 voting Liberal Democrats supported it. Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, and several independents also voted in favour. There were no notable cross-party rebels on either side.
Voting Aye meant
Support adding explicit protections for building society members and the mutual sector into the code of practice, ensuring the Bank of England must consider the impact of demutualisation and explore mutual-sector buyers before proceeding.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, arguing the existing Bill and code of practice already provide sufficient flexibility for the Bank of England to handle building society resolutions without prescriptive statutory guidance that could hamper swift crisis decision-making.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
198
163
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
60
0
56
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
19
0
52
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
17
25
Independent
—
2
0
11
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
—
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
—
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports the Bill's overall aims but proposes amendments to limit the recapitalisation mechanism to small banks outside MREL, protect mutuals from demutualisation, and require a report on credit union resolution frameworks.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,226 words) →
Defends the Bill's flexibility and scope, arguing that statutory restrictions on the Bank of England's powers would hamper crisis response and that existing safeguards are sufficient; opposes all three main amendments.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,580 words) →
Emphasises the 2008 financial crisis lessons requiring speed and flexibility; strongly opposes amendments 1, 3, and 4 as impractical restrictions that would slow crisis resolution and increase costs.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,800 words) →
Supports amendments 3 and 4 to restrict the mechanism to small/medium banks and require consideration of competitiveness and growth impacts before using the levy.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (366 words) →
Chairs the debate and manages scope; reminds speakers to focus on amendments under discussion rather than broader related issues.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (647 words) →
Supports credit unions; raises concern that bank executives retain bonuses during crises while pensioners suffer, questioning whether legislation protects against executive compensation.Democratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (201 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0