National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 21B
Tuesday, 25 March 2025 · Division No. 143 · Commons
137 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support rejecting the Lords protection for hospices and social care providers, maintaining the NI rise applies to these sectors while pointing to separate capital funding
Voting No means
Oppose overriding the Lords amendment; want hospices, social care providers and NHS contractors exempted or compensated for the employer NI increase
Parliament voted on 25 March 2025 to reject Lords Amendment 21B to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, by 314 votes to 196. The motion, brought by the government, instructed the Commons to disagree with the Lords amendment, which had sought to modify the employer National Insurance contribution changes introduced by the Bill. This was one of several Lords amendments considered that day, alongside 1B, 5B and 8B, all of which the government also moved to reject.
The vote matters because it clears the way for the government's employer National Insurance reforms to proceed without the modifications the House of Lords had introduced. The Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions (paid by employers) from 13.8 percent to 15 percent, and simultaneously reduces the earnings threshold at which employers begin paying from £9,100 to £5,000. The Lords amendments sought to exempt certain health and care providers, including GP practices, NHS-commissioned dentists and pharmacists, care homes, hospices and small businesses, from these changes. By rejecting Amendment 21B, the Commons upheld the government's position that no such statutory exemption should apply to those providers, meaning they face the full impact of both the rate rise and the lower threshold.
The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party members who voted supported the government. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, Green and Reform UK member who voted backed the Lords amendment. There were no Labour rebels. The division sits within a broader pattern of the government using its Commons majority to override Lords amendments in the final stages of the Bill, with a parallel vote the same day on Amendment 1B producing a similar result of 312 to 190.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Grantham and Bourne
Amendments essential to protect hospices facing £30m annual cost, children's hospices facing £5m combined cost, and smallest businesses already hit by business rates cuts and Employment Rights Bill red tape.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · St Albans
Henry VIII powers in amendments would allow government to exempt health and care providers when growth materializes; capital funding for hospices is insufficient; amendment 8B should empower exemption of small businesses.
Voted No
Conservative · Herne Bay and Sandwich
Bill directly taxes jobs in hospices and care sector; government claim of compensation is illusory; hospice care is integral to NHS and should be treated as such; staff reduction is inevitable.
Voted No
Scottish National Party · Angus and Perthshire Glens
Social care, GP, pharmacy and hospice sectors cannot diversify or raise prices; government's £24bn fiscal drag produces only £10bn net benefit and would fall to £8bn if proper exemptions granted; this represents catastrophic policy misadventure.
Voted No
Conservative · Broadland and Fakenham
Government's exemption of NHS proves it understands the damage to healthcare; deliberate decision to penalize hospices; perverse that assisted dying funding may come from taxation of palliative care.
Voted No
Conservative · Gainsborough
St Barnabas hospice in Lincoln losing £300,000 annually; government health settlement does not compensate; contradicts commitment to palliative care expressed in assisted dying debates.
Voted No
Labour · Farnham and Bordon
Inconsistency: NHS England exempted but NHS GPs, dentists not; unclear why public body gets exemption while contractors delivering same services do not.
Voted No
Labour · Ealing North
Government must reject amendments 1B, 5B, 8B and 21B as they undermine £24bn funding target; exemptions would require higher borrowing, lower spending or other tax rises; approach mirrors Conservative health and social care levy policy.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 13B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E
31 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 8B
25 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
25 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
25 Mar 2025
Non Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
25 Mar 2025