National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5B
Tuesday, 25 March 2025 · Division No. 141 · Commons
144 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the government's position of limiting NI exemptions to direct public employers (NHS England, local government, public corporations), rejecting a broader exemption for GPs, dentists and hospices
Voting No means
Back the Lords amendment to exempt GPs, dentists, hospices and other independent health and social care providers from the employer NI increase, arguing the government's approach leaves key NHS services worse off
Parliament voted on 25 March 2025 to reject Lords Amendment 5B to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, passing the motion to disagree by 311 votes to 192. The amendment, brought back by the House of Lords after an earlier version had already been rejected by the Commons, sought to exempt certain health and social care providers, including GP practices, NHS-commissioned dentists, NHS-commissioned pharmacists, care providers and charitable providers, from the employer National Insurance contribution increases contained in the Bill. The government's successful vote means those exemptions will not be written into law.
The Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions paid by employers from 13.8% to 15%, and simultaneously lowers the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions from £9,100 to £5,000 per year. The government is compensating large public sector employers, including NHS England, central government departments and local authorities, for the increased costs. However, independent contractors who deliver NHS-commissioned services, such as GPs, dentists and pharmacists, as well as hospices and private social care providers, do not receive equivalent compensation. Critics argue this creates a structural disparity in which the services most reliant on low-paid care workers and fixed public funding face the sharpest cost increases with the least capacity to absorb them.
The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government's position. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and Reform UK member who voted opposed it. There were no notable rebels on either side. The vote was one of several on the same day, including a parallel division on Lords Amendment 1B, which the government also defeated by 312 to 190, and it follows a pattern seen in related legislation, including the Non-Domestic Rating Bill, where the Commons has consistently overridden Lords amendments on tax and fiscal matters in the same parliamentary period.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Grantham and Bourne
Amendments essential to protect hospices facing £30m annual cost, children's hospices facing £5m combined cost, and smallest businesses already hit by business rates cuts and Employment Rights Bill red tape.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · St Albans
Henry VIII powers in amendments would allow government to exempt health and care providers when growth materializes; capital funding for hospices is insufficient; amendment 8B should empower exemption of small businesses.
Voted No
Conservative · Herne Bay and Sandwich
Bill directly taxes jobs in hospices and care sector; government claim of compensation is illusory; hospice care is integral to NHS and should be treated as such; staff reduction is inevitable.
Voted No
Scottish National Party · Angus and Perthshire Glens
Social care, GP, pharmacy and hospice sectors cannot diversify or raise prices; government's £24bn fiscal drag produces only £10bn net benefit and would fall to £8bn if proper exemptions granted; this represents catastrophic policy misadventure.
Voted No
Conservative · Broadland and Fakenham
Government's exemption of NHS proves it understands the damage to healthcare; deliberate decision to penalize hospices; perverse that assisted dying funding may come from taxation of palliative care.
Voted No
Conservative · Gainsborough
St Barnabas hospice in Lincoln losing £300,000 annually; government health settlement does not compensate; contradicts commitment to palliative care expressed in assisted dying debates.
Voted No
Labour · Farnham and Bordon
Inconsistency: NHS England exempted but NHS GPs, dentists not; unclear why public body gets exemption while contractors delivering same services do not.
Voted No
Labour · Ealing North
Government must reject amendments 1B, 5B, 8B and 21B as they undermine £24bn funding target; exemptions would require higher borrowing, lower spending or other tax rises; approach mirrors Conservative health and social care levy policy.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 13B
31 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E
31 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 8B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 21B
25 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
25 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
25 Mar 2025
Non Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
25 Mar 2025