A divisionDivision No. 122 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Schedule 2

333Ayes
100Noes
Carried · majority 233 · Government won
215 did not vote
Aye332No102DID NOT VOTE · 215

648 Members · Aye 333 · No 100 · DNV 215 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 12 March 2025, MPs voted to add a new schedule to the Employment Rights Bill that amends trade union recognition rules under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The motion was moved by minister Justin Madders and passed by 333 votes to 100. The vote took place during the Bill's Report Stage, the phase at which MPs debate and vote on specific amendments to a piece of legislation before it moves to the House of Lords. The new schedule adjusts the statutory framework for collective bargaining recognition, making it easier for trade unions to gain formal recognition by employers. This sits within the Bill's broader package of labour market reforms, which also includes day-one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed-hours contracts for zero and low-hours workers, restrictions on fire and rehire practices, and the consolidation of enforcement bodies into a new Fair Work Agency. Together, these measures represent a substantial shift in the balance of workplace rights in Great Britain. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most independents. Conservatives, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party voted against. There were no significant cross-party rebellions. The vote is part of a sustained divide over the Bill, which the government presents as delivering its "Make Work Pay" agenda while Conservative opponents argue it will deter investment and harm small businesses and workers who prefer flexible arrangements.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Employment Rights Bill's provisions expanding trade union recognition rights, alongside the Bill's broader package of reforms including day-one unfair dismissal rights, restrictions on fire and rehire, and protections for zero-hours workers.
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill as anti-business legislation that will deter investment, burden small businesses with excessive regulation, and undermine the flexible working arrangements that many workers and employers rely on.
§ 01Who voted how.433 voting Members · 215 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
278
0
83
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
6
1
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted aye · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0