A divisionDivision No. 123 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill: Third Reading

333Ayes
100Noes
Carried · majority 233 · Government won
214 did not vote
Aye333No102DID NOT VOTE · 214

647 Members · Aye 333 · No 100 · DNV 214 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted 333 to 100 on 12 March 2025 to pass the Employment Rights Bill at Third Reading, its final stage in the House of Commons before the Bill moved to the Lords. Third Reading is the last opportunity for the Commons to approve or reject a bill in its entirety. The margin was substantial, with 333 MPs backing the Bill and 100 opposing it. The Bill represents the most significant overhaul of employment law in a generation. Its central measures include: removing the two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims and replacing it with a shorter initial employment period; requiring employers to offer guaranteed-hours contracts to zero and low-hours workers; extending Statutory Sick Pay from the first day of sickness and removing the lower earnings limit; tightening fire-and-rehire rules; strengthening duties on employers to prevent sexual harassment; and significantly expanding trade union rights, including by repealing the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023. A new Fair Work Agency will consolidate labour market enforcement. The practical effect touches millions of workers, particularly those in sectors with high rates of insecure or flexible employment such as hospitality, social care, and education. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 31 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the Bill, as did the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most Independents. All 94 voting Conservatives opposed it, joined by all five Reform UK MPs who voted and three Democratic Unionist Party MPs. There were no recorded Conservative votes in favour and no Labour votes against.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Employment Rights Bill, backing stronger workers' rights, guaranteed hours, day-one unfair dismissal protections, and expanded trade union powers, even at the cost of additional burdens on employers.
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill as anti-business legislation that piles regulation onto employers, threatens flexible working arrangements valued by many workers, and risks damaging economic growth and investment.
§ 01Who voted how.433 voting Members · 214 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
277
0
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
94
22
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
6
0
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted aye · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0