Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 297
Wednesday, 12 March 2025 · Division No. 121 · Commons
151 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support requiring public sector employers to secure productivity commitments from trade unions in return for pay increases, ensuring taxpayers get value from union deals
Voting No means
Oppose attaching such conditions, backing the Employment Rights Bill as drafted without additional constraints on public sector union negotiations
What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 297 to the Employment Rights Bill during its Report Stage on 12 March 2025. The amendment, tabled by the Conservatives, was defeated by 328 votes to 167. The amendment related to trade union industrial action and sought to place additional conditions or restrictions on how trade unions could organise and carry out industrial action.
Why it matters: The Employment Rights Bill is one of the most significant pieces of employment legislation in a generation, covering areas from zero-hours contracts and statutory sick pay to trade union rights and enforcement powers. Amendment 297 focused specifically on the industrial relations provisions of the Bill, seeking to modify the framework governing trade union activity. Its defeat means the government's original approach to these provisions remains intact, preserving the expanded rights and protections for trade unions that the Bill contains. The vote affects millions of workers who are trade union members, as well as employers across both public and private sectors who will need to operate within the reformed industrial relations framework.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 279 Labour MPs and 27 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 94 voting Conservatives and 62 voting Liberal Democrats supported it. Reform UK's five voting MPs also backed the amendment, as did three Democratic Unionists and four independents. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens all voted against. The debate was marked by sharp exchanges over trade union funding of the Labour Party, with Conservative MPs arguing the Bill represented political payback for union financial support, and Labour MPs defending trade union members as ordinary working people whose rights deserved protection.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Mid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retained
Voted Aye
Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEs
Conservative · New Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for members
Voted Aye
Independent/Liberal · Congleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closures
Voted No
Labour · Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rights
Voted No
Labour · Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measures
Voted No
Labour · Stoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interests
Voted No
Related Votes
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4
4 Jun 2025
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 16
4 Jun 2025
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 24
4 Jun 2025
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords]: Third Reading
4 Jun 2025
Opposition Day: Business and the economy
21 May 2025
Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords]: New Clause 3
24 Apr 2025
Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords]: Amendment 2
24 Apr 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5B
25 Mar 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 8B
25 Mar 2025