A divisionDivision No. 120 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 291

164Ayes
324Noes
Defeated · majority 160 · Government won
158 did not vote
Aye166No325DID NOT VOTE · 158

646 Members · Aye 164 · No 324 · DNV 158 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 12 March 2025 to reject Amendment 291 to the Employment Rights Bill, a Conservative amendment that would have removed Clause 52 from the Bill. The result was 164 votes in favour and 324 against, a defeat for the amendment. Clause 52 changes the rules on trade union political funds, switching the default for members from opt-out to opt-in for contributions to those funds. The change matters because trade union political funds are used to donate to and support political parties, including the Labour Party. Under the existing opt-out system, union members are enrolled automatically and must take action to stop contributing. Clause 52, which the amendment sought to remove, preserves that opt-out arrangement rather than requiring members to give active consent. The Conservatives argued this amounts to a subscription trap, drawing workers' money into political causes without explicit agreement. The Government rejected that argument and voted to keep the clause. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 279 Labour MPs and 29 Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted against the amendment, blocking it comfortably. All 94 Conservatives present supported it, joined by all 62 Liberal Democrats who voted, 5 Reform UK members, 3 Democratic Unionists, and 1 independent. The Liberal Democrats' support for the Conservative amendment represented a cross-party alliance against the clause, though the combined opposition fell well short of the Government's majority. The vote is one of several at Report Stage of a Bill that significantly expands trade union rights, and Conservative speakers framed the political fund clause as evidence of a circular relationship between the Labour Government and the union movement.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring trade union members to actively opt in to political fund contributions, arguing workers should give explicit consent before their subscriptions fund political parties
Voting No meant
Oppose the opt-in change, defending the opt-out system for trade union political funds and rejecting Conservative characterisation of it as a subscription trap
§ 01Who voted how.488 voting Members · 158 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
279
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
2
6
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0