A divisionDivision No. 120 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 291

164Ayes
324Noes
Defeated · majority 160 · Government won
158 did not vote
Aye166No325DID NOT VOTE · 158

646 Members · Aye 164 · No 324 · DNV 158 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 12 March 2025 on Amendment 291 to the Employment Rights Bill during its Report Stage (the phase where the full House of Commons scrutinises and revises a bill after it has been examined in committee). The amendment, tabled by the Conservatives, concerned trade union political funds and would have maintained the existing requirement for union members to actively opt in to contributing to a political fund, rather than allowing the change proposed in the bill, which shifts to an opt-out arrangement. The amendment was defeated by 324 votes to 164. The vote matters because it determines how trade unions may collect money for political activity, including donations to political parties. Under the current law, union members must explicitly choose to join the political fund levy. The Employment Rights Bill, through Clause 52, would reverse this, making contribution the default position unless a member actively opts out. The Conservative amendment sought to preserve the opt-in requirement. The defeat of the amendment means the bill's opt-out model is set to proceed, which critics argue will increase the flow of money into trade union political funds and, by extension, to the Labour Party. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 308 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government by voting No. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted Aye, combining for 164 votes against the government. The Liberal Democrats voted with the Conservatives despite their overall stated support for many parts of the Employment Rights Bill, reflecting their specific objection to this provision. The Green Party and Plaid Cymru backed the government. The debate was notably heated, with exchanges about financial interests on both sides, declarations of trade union membership from Labour MPs, and Conservative accusations that the bill amounted to repayment of trade union financial support for the Labour Party.

Voting Aye meant
Support removing the clause, arguing it makes it too easy for unions to collect political fund contributions without members actively opting in, effectively channelling more money to Labour
Voting No meant
Oppose removing the clause, backing the government's reform to trade union political fund rules as part of the broader Employment Rights Bill
§ 01Who voted how.488 voting Members · 158 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
279
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
1
7
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0