Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 110
168Ayes
314Noes
Defeated · majority 146 · Government won165 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 168 · No 314 · DNV 165 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 12 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 110 during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Daisy Cooper, sought to add additional worker protections beyond those already contained in the government's bill. The motion was defeated by 314 votes to 168. The Employment Rights Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation reforming employment law in Great Britain, covering areas including statutory sick pay, zero-hours contracts, parental leave, and trade union rights. New Clause 110 would have extended the bill's protections further, but the government opposed the amendment, meaning the bill proceeds without it. The vote reflects ongoing debate about how far employment legislation should go in protecting workers, and at what cost to employers and economic growth. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the new clause, in line with the government's position. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour, representing an unusual cross-party alignment. The Greens voted against alongside Labour. The debate was coloured by sharp exchanges over trade union funding, business regulation, and the economic impact of the bill, with Conservatives arguing the legislation stifles growth and Labour MPs defending the reforms as long-overdue protections for working people.
Voting Aye meant
Support strengthening the Employment Rights Bill with additional Liberal Democrat-proposed provisions on employment rights enforcement or worker protections
Voting No meant
Oppose the Liberal Democrat amendment, preferring the government's existing provisions in the Bill without these additions
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
279
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
4
2
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words) →
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words) →
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words) →
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words) →
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words) →
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words) →
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0