Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 110

Wednesday, 12 March 2025 · Division No. 119 · Commons

168Ayes
314Noes
Defeated

165 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment defeatedPro Workers Rights(Yes)Pro Employment Enforcement(Yes)Pro Trade Union Rights(Yes)Government Bill Integrity(No)

Voting Yes means

Support strengthening the Employment Rights Bill with additional Liberal Democrat-proposed provisions on employment rights enforcement or worker protections

Voting No means

Oppose the Liberal Democrat amendment, preferring the government's existing provisions in the Bill without these additions

What happened: On 12 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 110 during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Daisy Cooper, sought to add additional worker protections beyond those already contained in the government's bill. The motion was defeated by 314 votes to 168.

Why it matters: The Employment Rights Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation reforming employment law in Great Britain, covering areas including statutory sick pay, zero-hours contracts, parental leave, and trade union rights. New Clause 110 would have extended the bill's protections further, but the government opposed the amendment, meaning the bill proceeds without it. The vote reflects ongoing debate about how far employment legislation should go in protecting workers, and at what cost to employers and economic growth.

The politics: Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the new clause, in line with the government's position. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour, representing an unusual cross-party alignment. The Greens voted against alongside Labour. The debate was coloured by sharp exchanges over trade union funding, business regulation, and the economic impact of the bill, with Conservatives arguing the legislation stifles growth and Labour MPs defending the reforms as long-overdue protections for working people.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/279 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/29 No
Independent
4 Aye/2 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Greg Smith

Conservative · Mid Buckinghamshire

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retained

Voted Aye

Wendy Morton

Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills

Opposed

Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEs

Sir Julian Lewis

Conservative · New Forest East

Questioning

Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for members

Voted Aye

Sarah Russell

Independent/Liberal · Congleton

Questioning

Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closures

Voted No

Justin Madders

Labour · Ellesmere Port and Bromborough

Supportive

Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rights

Voted No

Liam Byrne

Labour · Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North

Supportive

Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measures

Voted No

Gareth Snell

Labour · Stoke-on-Trent Central

Supportive

Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interests

Voted No

Related Votes