A divisionDivision No. 119 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 110

168Ayes
314Noes
Defeated · majority 146 · Government won
165 did not vote
Aye170No314DID NOT VOTE · 165

647 Members · Aye 168 · No 314 · DNV 165 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 12 March 2025 on New Clause 110, tabled by Liberal Democrat MPs during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause concerned parts 4 and 5 of the Bill, covering trade union and industrial action provisions, which the Liberal Democrats argued remained unresolved. The vote was defeated by 314 votes to 168. The Employment Rights Bill makes extensive changes to employment law, including expanding trade union rights, repealing the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023, and introducing workplace access rights for unions. The Liberal Democrats argued that large amounts of crucial detail in the trade union sections had been left to secondary legislation, future consultation, and further government amendments, making it impossible to assess or endorse those parts of the Bill in their current form. The government opposed the clause, arguing that the Bill already addresses the relevant concerns and that outstanding detail would be settled through consultation and secondary legislation after Royal Assent. The vote divided almost entirely along opposition-versus-government lines. All 308 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause. The Liberal Democrats provided 62 of the 168 Aye votes, with 64 Conservatives, 6 Reform UK MPs, 3 Democratic Unionist Party MPs, and a small number of independents and one Ulster Unionist also voting in favour. The Green Party voted with the government. No Labour MPs broke with their party on the clause.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding further provisions to the Employment Rights Bill to address what the Liberal Democrats saw as unresolved detail in the trade union and industrial action parts of the legislation.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, with the Labour government arguing the Bill already addresses the relevant concerns or that further detail would be resolved through consultation and secondary legislation after Royal Assent.
§ 01Who voted how.482 voting Members · 165 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
279
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
5
2
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0