A divisionDivision No. 118 · Wednesday, 12 March 2025· Commons· Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39

337Ayes
98Noes
Carried · majority 239 · Government won
209 did not vote
Aye338No102DID NOT VOTE · 209

644 Members · Aye 337 · No 98 · DNV 209 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament passed New Clause 39 of the Employment Rights Bill on 12 March 2025, by 337 votes to 98. The clause was one of several government new clauses debated together at Report Stage, covering trade union access rights, collective redundancy consultation, annual leave records, and agency workers. The vote advances the government's broad reform of employment law. The specific package includes amendments to clause 50 of the Bill that strengthen trade union workplace access rights, streamlining the process by allowing a single Central Arbitration Committee member to make fast-track decisions on access applications. Other clauses in the group cover collective agreements, redundancy consultation protections, and obligations on employers to keep annual leave records. Together these form part of a wider legislative effort to expand trade union rights and update the industrial relations framework. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most smaller parties. All 95 Conservative MPs who voted opposed the clause, along with all six Reform UK members who voted and one independent. There were no Conservative or Reform UK ayes. The result reflects the Employment Rights Bill's central place in the government's domestic programme and the sharp party-political divide over trade union rights and employment regulation that has run throughout the Bill's passage.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's package of amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, including strengthening trade union workplace access rights and modernising the industrial relations framework.
Voting No meant
Oppose the government's amendments, reflecting broader opposition to the Employment Rights Bill's expansion of trade union rights and employment protections.
§ 01Who voted how.435 voting Members · 209 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
280
0
81
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
95
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
6
1
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted aye · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0