Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 10
95Ayes
323Noes
Defeated · majority 228 · Government won227 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 95 · No 323 · DNV 227 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament rejected a Liberal Democrat amendment to the Employment Rights Bill on 11 March 2025 that would have made carer's leave a paid entitlement. The amendment, New Clause 10, was defeated by 323 votes to 95. The existing Carer's Leave Act 2023 already provides for unpaid leave, and the new clause sought to build on that by requiring employers to pay workers during that leave period. The practical effect of the vote is that working carers continue to have a right to take unpaid leave, but no right to pay during that absence. Liberal Democrat MP Alison Bennett argued during the debate that paid carer's leave would allow workers to juggle employment and caring responsibilities, citing Carers UK figures suggesting that carers being able to stay in work is worth £5.3 billion to the economy. The government declined to legislate for the entitlement at this stage, with ministers signalling that some reforms under the broader plan to make work pay would take longer to implement, and preferring a consultative approach before any change. The vote divided largely along party lines. Labour MPs provided almost all of the opposition to the clause, with 291 Labour members and 31 Labour and Co-operative members voting no. The Liberal Democrats voted unanimously in favour, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the Democratic Unionist Party, and smaller parties. One Labour MP voted with the ayes. The vote reflects a pattern in the bill's report stage where the government resisted amendments from opposition parties seeking to extend new employment rights beyond what ministers had already proposed.
Voting Aye meant
Support making carer's leave a paid entitlement, arguing it helps working carers juggle employment and caring responsibilities and benefits the wider economy.
Voting No meant
Oppose mandating paid carer's leave at this stage, with the Labour government preferring to defer the issue rather than legislate now — likely citing cost and implementation concerns.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
291
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
6
3
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
2
0
0
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,187 words) →
Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (511 words) →
Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,193 words) →
Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,325 words) →
Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,224 words) →
Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,449 words) →
Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (865 words) →
Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,378 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0