Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 10

Tuesday, 11 March 2025 · Division No. 114 · Commons

95Ayes
323Noes
Defeated

227 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment defeatedPro Carers Rights(Yes)Pro Workers Rights(Yes)Pro Welfare Expansion(Yes)Employer Cost Concerns(No)

Voting Yes means

Support making carer's leave a paid right, arguing it helps working carers balance employment and caring responsibilities and benefits the wider economy

Voting No means

Oppose mandating paid carer's leave at this stage, likely citing cost concerns for employers or preferring to address it separately from the Employment Rights Bill

What happened: On 11 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 10 during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause, tabled by opposition MPs, would have made carer's leave a paid statutory right. The amendment was defeated by 323 votes to 95, meaning it will not be added to the Bill.

Why it matters: Currently, the Carer's Leave Act 2023 gives eligible employees the right to take up to five days of unpaid leave per year to provide or arrange care for a dependant. New Clause 10 sought to go further by making that leave paid. Proponents argued that paid carer's leave would unlock an estimated £5.3 billion in economic value by enabling working carers to remain in employment, and that major employers such as Centrica and HSBC already offer such arrangements voluntarily. By defeating the clause, the House kept carer's leave unpaid as a statutory floor, leaving any improvement to voluntary employer practice or future legislation.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. Nearly all Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the clause, keeping to the government's position. The Liberal Democrats supplied the largest bloc of votes in favour, with 65 of their MPs supporting the amendment, joined by the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the DUP, the SDLP, and most independents. Only one Labour MP voted for the clause. The Conservatives, despite their broader opposition to the Bill, did not vote for this particular amendment. The vote sits within a wider and politically charged Report Stage debate over the Employment Rights Bill, which has become a focal point for conflict between the government's pro-worker agenda and opposition concerns about the cost to businesses.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
1 Aye/292 No

1 rebel: Apsana Begum

Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9 Aye/0 No
Independent
6 Aye/2 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

1 MP voted against their party whip

What They Said in the Debate

Gregory Stafford

Conservative · Farnham and Bordon

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.

Aphra Brandreth

Conservative · Chester South and Eddisbury

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.

Nick Timothy

Conservative · West Suffolk

Questioning

Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.

Steve Witherden

Labour · Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr

Supportive

Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.

Voted No

Sarah Russell

Labour · Congleton

Supportive

Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.

Voted No

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Supportive

Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.

Voted No

Imran Hussain

Labour · Bradford East

Supportive

Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.

Voted No

Related Votes

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 10 — Tuesday, 11 March 2025 | Beyond The Vote