Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 87

Tuesday, 11 March 2025 · Division No. 116 · Commons

106Ayes
340Noes
Defeated

199 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Business Deregulation(Yes)Pro Workers Rights(No)Anti Employment Rights Bill(Yes)Pro Economic Competitiveness(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring ministers to weigh economic growth and UK competitiveness when enacting employment law changes, reflecting concern that the Bill harms small businesses and flexible workers

Voting No means

Oppose adding a competitiveness requirement, backing the Employment Rights Bill as drafted without this constraint on how the Secretary of State exercises powers

What happened: The House of Commons voted on New Clause 87, an opposition amendment to the Employment Rights Bill at Report Stage, on 11 March 2025. The amendment was defeated by 340 votes to 106. The Employment Rights Bill itself, a flagship piece of government legislation, continued its parliamentary passage with the government's own provisions intact.

Why it matters: The Employment Rights Bill is one of the largest overhauls of workplace law in decades, covering zero-hours contracts, fire and rehire practices, unfair dismissal protections, flexible working rights, statutory sick pay, trade union rights, and protections for pregnant workers and new mothers. New Clause 87 was one of numerous opposition amendments tabled during Report Stage, seeking to alter or add to the government's proposals. Its defeat means the government's version of these provisions proceeds unamended by this particular clause, affecting millions of workers and employers across the country.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 325 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, with no rebels recorded. The 106 supporting votes came primarily from Conservative MPs (94), joined by Reform UK (6), the Democratic Unionist Party (3), the Traditional Unionist Voice (1), and a handful of independents (3). The Greens, Plaid Cymru, and the SDLP voted with the government against the amendment. The debate reflected a wider political battle, with Conservatives framing the Bill as damaging to businesses and small employers, while Labour MPs and their allies described it as a historic advance for working people.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/294 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
3 Aye/7 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/2 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Gregory Stafford

Conservative · Farnham and Bordon

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.

Voted Aye

Aphra Brandreth

Conservative · Chester South and Eddisbury

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.

Voted Aye

Nick Timothy

Conservative · West Suffolk

Questioning

Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.

Voted Aye

Steve Witherden

Labour · Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr

Supportive

Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.

Voted No

Sarah Russell

Labour · Congleton

Supportive

Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.

Voted No

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Supportive

Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.

Voted No

Imran Hussain

Labour · Bradford East

Supportive

Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.

Voted No

Related Votes

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 87 — Tuesday, 11 March 2025 | Beyond The Vote