Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 288

Tuesday, 11 March 2025 · Division No. 117 · Commons

105Ayes
409Noes
Defeated

136 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Workers Rights(No)Pro Small Business Deregulation(Yes)Anti Employer Liability Expansion(Yes)Workplace Harassment Protections(No)

Voting Yes means

Support carving out hospitality and sports venues from employer liability for third-party harassment, arguing it is unworkable for small businesses like pubs and bars

Voting No means

Oppose the exemption, arguing all workers in hospitality and sports venues deserve the same protection from harassment as workers elsewhere

What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 288 to the Employment Rights Bill during its Report Stage on 11 March 2025. The amendment, put forward by the Conservative opposition, sought to make alternative modifications to the government's worker protection proposals within the Bill. The amendment was defeated by 409 votes to 105, a margin of over 300 votes.

Why it matters: The Employment Rights Bill is the government's flagship legislation intended to overhaul workplace protections in the United Kingdom. Opposition amendments at Report Stage represent attempts to reshape the Bill before it moves to the House of Lords. By defeating this amendment, the government maintained its preferred version of the legislation, which includes measures on zero-hours contracts, fire and rehire practices, unfair dismissal protections from day one of employment, statutory sick pay for lower-paid workers, and protections for pregnant workers and new mothers. The Bill is described by ministers as the most significant expansion of employment rights in a generation, affecting millions of workers across the country.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 291 voting Labour MPs and their Labour and Co-operative colleagues rejected the amendment, joined by the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens. The Conservatives provided the bulk of the 105 Aye votes, with Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party also voting in favour of the amendment. This reflects a pattern throughout the Bill's passage of opposition parties using amendments to challenge specific provisions while the government relied on its substantial Commons majority to defeat them.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/291 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
93 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/62 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/30 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/9 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7 Aye/0 No
Independent
3 Aye/2 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/2 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Gregory Stafford

Conservative · Farnham and Bordon

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.

Voted Aye

Aphra Brandreth

Conservative · Chester South and Eddisbury

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.

Voted Aye

Nick Timothy

Conservative · West Suffolk

Questioning

Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.

Voted Aye

Steve Witherden

Labour · Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr

Supportive

Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.

Voted No

Sarah Russell

Labour · Congleton

Supportive

Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.

Voted No

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Supportive

Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.

Voted No

Imran Hussain

Labour · Bradford East

Supportive

Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.

Voted No

Related Votes