National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: New Clause 1

Tuesday, 17 December 2024 · Division No. 72 · Commons

195Ayes
353Noes
Defeated

104 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedAnti Employer Ni Increase(Yes)Pro Tax On Business(No)Fiscal Responsibility(Yes)Pro Public Services Funding(No)

Voting Yes means

Support the Conservative new clause opposing or restricting the government's employer National Insurance increase, arguing Labour broke its election promise not to raise National Insurance

Voting No means

Reject the Conservative new clause and support the government's employer National Insurance rise as a necessary measure to fund public services

What happened: The House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on 17 December 2024 on New Clause 1 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The new clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, sought to add protections or exemptions for certain businesses and organisations facing increased employer National Insurance contributions under the Bill. The motion was defeated by 353 votes to 195.

Why it matters: The underlying Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, paid by employers, from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying. New Clause 1 would have limited the scope of those increases by carving out protections for specified sectors. Debate centred heavily on the impact of the rises on GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities and nurseries, all of which are privately operated but substantially funded through public commissioning. Opponents of the clause argued that rejecting it was necessary to protect public finances and fund NHS investment; supporters argued the rises would directly undermine the very services the government said it wanted to protect.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 347 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru all voted in favour of the new clause. There were no notable rebellions on the Labour benches. The vote sits within a broader contested narrative about the October 2024 Budget, with the opposition accusing the government of breaking pre-election pledges not to raise National Insurance, and the government arguing the rises were made necessary by inherited fiscal pressures.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/310 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
96 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
69 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/37 No
Independent
6 Aye/3 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Pippa Heylings

Liberal Democrats · South Cambridgeshire

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.

Voted Aye

Gareth Davies

Conservative · Grantham and Bourne

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.

Voted Aye

Dr Luke Evans

Conservative · Hinckley and Bosworth

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.

Voted Aye

Sorcha Eastwood

Ulster Unionist Party · Lagan Valley

Opposed

Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.

Voted Aye

Carla Denyer

Green Party · Bristol Central

Questioning

Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.

Joe Morris

Labour · Hexham

Supportive

Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.

Voted No

Yuan Yang

Labour · Earley and Woodley

Supportive

Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.

Voted No

Chris Curtis

Labour · Milton Keynes North

Supportive

Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.

Voted No

Related Votes