A divisionDivision No. 71 · Tuesday, 17 December 2024· Commons· Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 23

196Ayes
352Noes
Defeated · majority 156 · Government won
104 did not vote
Aye195No350DID NOT VOTE · 104

652 Members · Aye 196 · No 352 · DNV 104 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Amendment 23 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill was defeated on 17 December 2024 by 352 votes to 196. The amendment sought to preserve the existing 13.8% employer National Insurance rate for a defined group of employers, specifically charities registered in the charity register or Scottish charity register, voluntary organisations, GP practices, universities, and further education colleges, while the rest of the economy moved to the new 15% rate the bill introduces from April 2025. The defeat means these sectors will face the full employer NIC increase alongside all other employers. GP practices, which are typically independent contractor businesses rather than NHS bodies, will bear higher payroll costs without direct access to the NHS budget uplift that hospital trusts may receive. Charities and universities have similarly argued they cannot easily pass costs on to customers or raise prices, making them more exposed than commercial employers to the rise in the secondary threshold reduction and the rate increase combined. Every Conservative MP voted for the amendment, joined by all 70 Liberal Democrat MPs who voted, all five Democratic Unionist Party members, all five Reform UK MPs present, three Plaid Cymru MPs, and one SNP MP. Labour, including Labour and Co-operative Party members, voted unanimously against, providing the government's majority. No Labour MP supported the amendment. The vote reflects a clear government intention to apply the NIC changes uniformly, resisting sector-specific carve-outs that opposition parties framed as protection for public-facing and charitable employers.

Voting Aye meant
Support shielding charities, GP practices, universities and further education colleges from the employer NIC rise by maintaining their rate at 13.8%
Voting No meant
Oppose carve-outs for specific sectors, backing a uniform 15% employer NIC rate across all employers as proposed in the government's Budget measure
§ 01Who voted how.548 voting Members · 104 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
310
51
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
101
0
15
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
69
0
2
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
7
3
4
Scottish National Party
1
0
8
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0