National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 23
196Ayes
352Noes
Defeated · majority 156 · Government won104 did not vote
652 Members · Aye 196 · No 352 · DNV 104 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 17 December 2024, the House of Commons sitting in Committee of the whole House voted on Amendment 23 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The amendment would have modified the employer National Insurance contribution increases set out in the Bill, aiming to reduce the burden on certain employers. The amendment was defeated by 352 votes to 196. The Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, paid by employers, from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions. Amendment 23 sought to carve out or reduce that burden for specific categories of employer. The debate focused heavily on the effect of the increases on GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities, nurseries and small businesses, all of which are either privately run or voluntary-sector organisations that cannot easily absorb higher payroll costs. Critics argued that sectors already under financial strain would face cuts to staffing and services as a direct consequence of higher employer National Insurance bills, with knock-on effects for NHS capacity and social care provision. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 346 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government by voting no, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party and Plaid Cymru all voted aye. Seven independents voted aye and three voted no. The Scottish National Party sent only one member to vote, who voted aye. There were no notable rebels on either side. The debate took place against the backdrop of Opposition accusations that the government had broken pre-election promises not to raise National Insurance, while the government defended the measure as necessary to repair what it described as a damaged fiscal inheritance from the Conservatives.
Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a reduced secondary National Insurance rate for qualifying employments, protecting certain employers or workers from the full impact of the NI increase
Voting No meant
Oppose the reduced rate exemption, backing the government's approach of applying the increased employer NI contributions uniformly without special carve-outs
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
310
51
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
101
0
15
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
70
0
2
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
—
6
3
5
Scottish National Party
—
1
0
8
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
1
0
0
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words) →
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words) →
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words) →
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words) →
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words) →
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0