A divisionDivision No. 70 · Tuesday, 17 December 2024· Commons· Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 13

206Ayes
353Noes
Defeated · majority 147 · Government won
92 did not vote
Aye204No353DID NOT VOTE · 92

651 Members · Aye 206 · No 353 · DNV 92 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 17 December 2024 on Amendment 13 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, which proposed carving out specific sectors from the full employer National Insurance rate increase. The amendment, tabled by the Conservative opposition, would have maintained the existing 13.8% employer NICs rate for charities registered in England, Scotland or as voluntary organisations, GP practices, universities and further education colleges, rather than applying the new 15% rate the bill introduces. It was defeated by 353 votes to 206 (Division 70). The bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 NICs paid by employers from 13.8% to 15% from April 2025, while also lowering the threshold at which employers become liable from £9,100 to £5,000 per year. The amendment would have shielded a defined group of employers in the charity, health and education sectors from the rate rise, leaving them liable at the old rate. Supporters argued these organisations provide essential community services and cannot easily absorb higher payroll costs without cutting those services. The government opposed any sector-specific carve-out, backing a universal increase to raise the revenue required for public spending. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 349 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government and rejected the amendment. Every Conservative (102), Liberal Democrat (70), SNP (8), Democratic Unionist Party (5), Reform UK (5), Plaid Cymru (3) and most independent MPs who voted supported the amendment. This created an unusually broad cross-party coalition in favour, though it fell well short of the Labour majority. The vote sits within a wider legislative debate over the fiscal and operational impact of the employer NICs increase, which the government has argued is necessary to repair public finances.

Voting Aye meant
Support carving out exemptions from the employer NI rise for charities, GP surgeries, universities and further education colleges, protecting these organisations from higher payroll costs.
Voting No meant
Oppose sector-specific exemptions, backing the government's position that the employer NI increase should apply universally to raise the revenue needed.
§ 01Who voted how.559 voting Members · 92 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
312
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
102
0
14
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
69
0
2
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
7
3
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0