National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 1

Tuesday, 17 December 2024 · Division No. 69 · Commons

100Ayes
351Noes
Defeated

195 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedPro Social Care Funding(Yes)Anti Employer Ni Increase(Yes)Pro Tax Exemption Social Care(Yes)Fiscal Responsibility(No)

Voting Yes means

Support exempting or reducing employer National Insurance for social care providers, arguing the sector cannot absorb the tax increase without cuts to services or staff pay

Voting No means

Oppose creating a special carve-out for social care from the employer National Insurance increase, backing the government's plan to apply the rise universally

What happened: The House of Commons, sitting in Committee of the Whole House, voted on Amendment 1 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill on 17 December 2024. The amendment, moved by Liberal Democrat MP Pippa Heylings, sought to exempt certain categories of employer from the full rate of the proposed increase in secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, specifically targeting care home and domiciliary care providers, GP practices, and related primary and social care services. The amendment was defeated by 351 votes to 100.

Why it matters: The Bill raises the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the earnings threshold at which employers begin paying. These changes are projected to raise approximately 25 billion pounds. Amendment 1 would have created a protected category of employers in health and social care, applying a lower "specified employer secondary percentage" to those providers. Opponents of the Bill argued that care homes, GP surgeries, hospices, charities, childcare providers, and other organisations that deliver publicly commissioned services but are not directly funded by government would face significant cost increases with no corresponding funding guarantee, threatening jobs, service capacity, and in some cases organisational viability.

The politics: Labour MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, providing the margin of defeat. The Liberal Democrats supplied the largest bloc of Aye votes at 71, joined by the Scottish National Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Green Party, Plaid Cymru, and most Reform UK MPs who voted. The Conservative Party tabled its own amendments in the same debate but did not vote for Amendment 1 in significant numbers, reflecting a separate opposition strategy rather than a unified cross-party front. The vote sits within a broader period of tension over employment costs, with related divisions on the Employment Rights Bill in March 2025 showing similar government-versus-opposition patterns on business burden questions.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/312 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
71 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/36 No
Independent
6 Aye/3 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Reform UK
2 Aye/0 No
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Pippa Heylings

Liberal Democrats · South Cambridgeshire

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.

Voted Aye

Gareth Davies

Conservative · Grantham and Bourne

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.

Dr Luke Evans

Conservative · Hinckley and Bosworth

Opposed

Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.

Sorcha Eastwood

Ulster Unionist Party · Lagan Valley

Opposed

Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.

Voted Aye

Carla Denyer

Green Party · Bristol Central

Questioning

Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.

Voted Aye

Joe Morris

Labour · Hexham

Supportive

Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.

Voted No

Yuan Yang

Labour · Earley and Woodley

Supportive

Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.

Voted No

Chris Curtis

Labour · Milton Keynes North

Supportive

Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.

Voted No

Related Votes