National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
100Ayes
351Noes
Defeated · majority 251 · Government won195 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 100 · No 351 · DNV 195 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons, sitting in Committee of the Whole House, voted on Amendment 1 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill on 17 December 2024. The amendment, moved by Liberal Democrat MP Pippa Heylings, sought to exempt certain categories of employer from the full rate of the proposed increase in secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, specifically targeting care home and domiciliary care providers, GP practices, and related primary and social care services. The amendment was defeated by 351 votes to 100. The Bill raises the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the earnings threshold at which employers begin paying. These changes are projected to raise approximately 25 billion pounds. Amendment 1 would have created a protected category of employers in health and social care, applying a lower "specified employer secondary percentage" to those providers. Opponents of the Bill argued that care homes, GP surgeries, hospices, charities, childcare providers, and other organisations that deliver publicly commissioned services but are not directly funded by government would face significant cost increases with no corresponding funding guarantee, threatening jobs, service capacity, and in some cases organisational viability. Labour MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, providing the margin of defeat. The Liberal Democrats supplied the largest bloc of Aye votes at 71, joined by the Scottish National Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Green Party, Plaid Cymru, and most Reform UK MPs who voted. The Conservative Party tabled its own amendments in the same debate but did not vote for Amendment 1 in significant numbers, reflecting a separate opposition strategy rather than a unified cross-party front. The vote sits within a broader period of tension over employment costs, with related divisions on the Employment Rights Bill in March 2025 showing similar government-versus-opposition patterns on business burden questions.
Voting Aye meant
Support exempting or reducing employer National Insurance for social care providers, arguing the sector cannot absorb the tax increase without cuts to services or staff pay
Voting No meant
Oppose creating a special carve-out for social care from the employer National Insurance increase, backing the government's plan to apply the rise universally
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
312
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
71
0
1
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
—
5
3
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
—
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
1
0
0
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words) →
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words) →
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,967 words) →
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,256 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words) →
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (119 words) →
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0