A divisionDivision No. 69 · Tuesday, 17 December 2024· Commons· Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 1

100Ayes
351Noes
Defeated · majority 251 · Government won
195 did not vote
Aye102No352DID NOT VOTE · 195

646 Members · Aye 100 · No 351 · DNV 195 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 17 December 2024 to reject Amendment 1 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The amendment, moved by Liberal Democrat MP Pippa Heylings, would have introduced a lower employer National Insurance rate for a defined set of health and social care providers, including regulated care homes, domiciliary support services, GP practices, dental services, pharmacy providers, hospices, and charitable health and care organisations. It was defeated by 351 votes to 100. The bill raises the employer NI rate from 13.8% to 15% and reduces the per-employee earnings threshold at which the liability begins from £9,100 to £5,000 per year, both taking effect from April 2025. Amendment 1 would have carved out those specified health and care employers from the higher rate, meaning they would pay less than the standard 15%. The sectors named in the amendment cannot easily pass higher payroll costs on to customers or raise prices, and many rely substantially on public funding. By rejecting the amendment, Parliament confirmed that these employers will face the same rate increase as all others from April 2025. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour MPs and all 36 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc in favour, with 71 of their 72 MPs voting aye. The SNP, DUP, Greens, and Plaid Cymru also voted for the amendment, as did five independents. Two Reform UK MPs voted aye while five had no vote recorded. The Conservative Party's interventions in the debate focused on their own amendments and a new clause rather than this specific proposal, though speakers including Gareth Davies criticised the bill's overall impact on employment and argued that the OBR projected 76% of the tax would be passed on to workers through lower wages and higher prices. The division sits within a broader political contest over the government's NI changes, which Opposition parties have framed as a breach of pre-election commitments.

Voting Aye meant
Support carving out a lower employer NI rate for social care providers, hospices, GP practices, pharmacies, and health charities, protecting front-line public-facing services from the full impact of the NI increase.
Voting No meant
Oppose creating sector-specific exemptions from the employer NI rise, backing a uniform increase across all employers as the means of raising revenue to fund public services.
§ 01Who voted how.451 voting Members · 195 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
312
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
70
0
1
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
6
3
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0