Pension Schemes Bill: Amendment 15
Wednesday, 3 December 2025 · Division No. 380 · Commons
189 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the Conservative opposition's proposed change to the Pension Schemes Bill (Amendment 15), as tabled by shadow ministers
Voting No means
Reject the Conservative amendment and back the government's version of the Pension Schemes Bill as it stands
What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 15 to the Pension Schemes Bill on 3 December 2025. The amendment, tabled by opposition parties, was defeated by 303 votes to 154. The government's own version of the Bill, along with a package of government new clauses it had introduced, was therefore preserved.
Why it matters: The Pension Schemes Bill makes significant changes to how occupational pension schemes operate in the United Kingdom. Among the most substantial changes being debated were new government clauses (31 to 33) introducing prospective indexation of Pension Protection Fund and Financial Assistance Scheme payments relating to pensions built up before 6 April 1997, linked to the Consumer Prices Index and capped at 2.5%. This affects over 250,000 members of those schemes, with the average PPF compensation expected to rise by around £400 per year over five years. A separate and contested question, raised by multiple MPs, concerns whether similar protections should extend to members of private defined-benefit schemes run by solvent companies, many of them large multinationals, who have not passed on any indexation increases for periods of up to 23 years.
The politics: The vote divided largely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist Party all voted in favour. There were no notable cross-party rebels on the government benches. The result reflects the broad arithmetical dominance of the Labour majority in the current Parliament. Although there is stated cross-party agreement on the broad aims of pension reform, the opposition parties sought specific changes the government declined to accept, preferring instead its own set of new clauses tabled alongside the Bill.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Didcot and Wantage
Welcomes PPF improvements but expresses concern that AEA Technology pension campaigners lack redress route despite NAO/Select Committee reports; urges reconsideration of new clause 1.
Conservative · New Forest East
Notes ExxonMobil private DB scheme pensioners feel discriminated against as they gain no benefit from FAS/PPF indexation improvements; questions whether trustees have sufficient leverage against foreign-headquartered employers.
Voted Aye
Labour · Llanelli
Expresses scepticism about whether surplus release changes will actually force companies like 3M and Hewlett Packard to provide index-linked rises; seeks meeting to understand available mechanisms.
Voted No
Conservative · Surrey Heath
Seeks reassurance for Surrey Heath constituents working for large US firms whose pensions fall outside PPF/FAS and receive no pre-1997 uplift.
Voted Aye
Conservative · North West Norfolk
Supports many Bill measures for pension accessibility but criticises that it fails to address pension adequacy; over 50% of savers will miss retirement income targets; proposes five-year review requirement via new clause 25.
Voted Aye
SNP · Aberdeen North
Welcomes trustee guidance proposal but requests clear timeline and roadmap for consultation and resulting primary/secondary legislation.
Voted Aye
Labour · Swansea West
Supports Bill as foundation for pension returns; announces prospective CPI-linked indexation (capped 2.5%) for PPF/FAS pre-1997 service and promises statutory guidance on trustee investment duties rather than primary legislation changes.
Voted No
Labour · Banbury
Welcomes Chancellor's Budget announcement on pensions; praises government action after decades of Conservative delay; seeks confirmation of benefit amounts from indexation changes.
Voted No
Related Votes
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
23 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
23 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading
3 Feb 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Third Reading
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Second Reading
17 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: New Clause 3
3 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: New Clause 26
3 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: Amendment 16
3 Dec 2025