National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Second Reading
Wednesday, 17 December 2025 · Division No. 395 · Commons
172 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support applying National Insurance to employer pension salary sacrifice arrangements above £2,000 annually from 2029, closing a tax relief that disproportionately benefits higher earners
Voting No means
Oppose extending National Insurance to pension salary sacrifice, arguing it increases costs on businesses and workers and undermines pension saving incentives
Parliament voted on 17 December 2025 to give a Second Reading to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, meaning the Bill passed its first full parliamentary debate and moved forward for further scrutiny. The result was 312 votes in favour and 165 against. A Second Reading is the stage at which MPs debate the general principles of a Bill before it proceeds to detailed line-by-line examination in committee.
The Bill creates a power to apply National Insurance contributions (NICs) to salary sacrifice pension contributions above £2,000 per year, with the change due to come into force from April 2029. Salary sacrifice is an arrangement where an employee agrees to reduce their gross salary, with the difference paid directly into their pension, meaning neither the employee nor the employer pays NICs on that portion of pay. The Bill would cap the NIC relief available through this mechanism. The government projects the measure will raise approximately £7 billion over the forecast period, while ministers argued that without action the cost of salary sacrifice relief would have reached £8 billion per year by the end of the decade. The £2,000 annual threshold is intended to protect lower earners, with ministers arguing that 60 percent of contributions through the scheme come from the top fifth of employees.
The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the four Green Party MPs and three independents. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and Ulster Unionist MP who voted did so against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions in either direction. The Bill sits within the broader context of the government's autumn 2025 Budget and is described by ministers as a companion piece to the Finance Bill debated the previous day.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Wyre Forest
This is a £4.8bn tax raid on savers that contradicts the government's own financial inclusion strategy; it will discourage pension saving when adequacy is a crisis, hits middle-income earners disproportionately, and creates administrative chaos for 290,000 employers.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Torbay
The policy creates a double whammy: short-term revenue for the government but long-term pain for savers; 40% of people are already unlikely to invest in pensions, and the measure adds to business burdens already from energy costs and previous NI hikes.
Voted No
SNP · Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey
Labour has broken its manifesto pledge not to raise NI; the CBI and ABI warn this is a tax on doing the right thing that will damage growth and pension saving; behavioural changes may mean far less revenue than the OBR forecasts.
Voted No
Conservative · Solihull West and Shirley
The Bill taxes aspiration and penalizes prudence; it discourages savings at exactly the wrong time and will disproportionately burden women returning from maternity leave who seek to catch up contributions.
Voted No
Conservative · North Bedfordshire
Another anti-aspiration measure that breaks Labour's tax pledge; the OBR figures appear inflated by timing to maximize 2029-30 revenue; the policy worsens private-sector pension security compared to public-sector gold-plated schemes.
Voted No
DUP · Strangford
Raises serious concerns about cost-of-living pressures on small businesses already facing utility increases of 52.7%, labour costs up 51.5%, and taxes up 47.2%.
Voted No
Labour · Swansea West
The cap is necessary, pragmatic, and fair; salary sacrifice costs are exploding (to £8bn/year), benefits disproportionately flow to high earners, and the policy protects 95% of those earning under £30k while giving businesses nearly 4 years to adjust.
Voted Aye
Labour · Chipping Barnet
The cap is fair targeting of a £75bn-per-year relief; low-wage workers cannot access salary sacrifice anyway, so they are unaffected; the long implementation gives businesses time to plan and the OBR costing is dynamic and robust.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
11 Mar 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 5
11 Mar 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 6
11 Mar 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill: Third Reading
11 Mar 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Third Reading
21 Jan 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Clause 63 Stand part
13 Jan 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 24
13 Jan 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 25
13 Jan 2026