National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Second Reading

Wednesday, 17 December 2025 · Division No. 395 · Commons

312Ayes
165Noes
Passed

172 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonPro Progressive Taxation(Yes)Anti Tax Relief For High Earners(Yes)Anti Business Tax Increase(No)Pro Pension Saving Incentives(No)

Voting Yes means

Support applying National Insurance to employer pension salary sacrifice arrangements above £2,000 annually from 2029, closing a tax relief that disproportionately benefits higher earners

Voting No means

Oppose extending National Insurance to pension salary sacrifice, arguing it increases costs on businesses and workers and undermines pension saving incentives

Parliament voted on 17 December 2025 to give a Second Reading to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, meaning the Bill passed its first full parliamentary debate and moved forward for further scrutiny. The result was 312 votes in favour and 165 against. A Second Reading is the stage at which MPs debate the general principles of a Bill before it proceeds to detailed line-by-line examination in committee.

The Bill creates a power to apply National Insurance contributions (NICs) to salary sacrifice pension contributions above £2,000 per year, with the change due to come into force from April 2029. Salary sacrifice is an arrangement where an employee agrees to reduce their gross salary, with the difference paid directly into their pension, meaning neither the employee nor the employer pays NICs on that portion of pay. The Bill would cap the NIC relief available through this mechanism. The government projects the measure will raise approximately £7 billion over the forecast period, while ministers argued that without action the cost of salary sacrifice relief would have reached £8 billion per year by the end of the decade. The £2,000 annual threshold is intended to protect lower earners, with ministers arguing that 60 percent of contributions through the scheme come from the top fifth of employees.

The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the four Green Party MPs and three independents. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and Ulster Unionist MP who voted did so against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions in either direction. The Bill sits within the broader context of the government's autumn 2025 Budget and is described by ministers as a companion piece to the Finance Bill debated the previous day.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
271 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/91 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/60 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
31 Aye/0 No
Reform UKWhipped No
0 Aye/6 No
Independent
3 Aye/2 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Democratic Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Mark Garnier

Conservative · Wyre Forest

Opposed

This is a £4.8bn tax raid on savers that contradicts the government's own financial inclusion strategy; it will discourage pension saving when adequacy is a crisis, hits middle-income earners disproportionately, and creates administrative chaos for 290,000 employers.

Voted No

Steve Darling

Liberal Democrat · Torbay

Opposed

The policy creates a double whammy: short-term revenue for the government but long-term pain for savers; 40% of people are already unlikely to invest in pensions, and the measure adds to business burdens already from energy costs and previous NI hikes.

Voted No

Graham Leadbitter

SNP · Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey

Opposed

Labour has broken its manifesto pledge not to raise NI; the CBI and ABI warn this is a tax on doing the right thing that will damage growth and pension saving; behavioural changes may mean far less revenue than the OBR forecasts.

Voted No

Dr Neil Shastri-Hurst

Conservative · Solihull West and Shirley

Opposed

The Bill taxes aspiration and penalizes prudence; it discourages savings at exactly the wrong time and will disproportionately burden women returning from maternity leave who seek to catch up contributions.

Voted No

Richard Fuller

Conservative · North Bedfordshire

Opposed

Another anti-aspiration measure that breaks Labour's tax pledge; the OBR figures appear inflated by timing to maximize 2029-30 revenue; the policy worsens private-sector pension security compared to public-sector gold-plated schemes.

Voted No

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Questioning

Raises serious concerns about cost-of-living pressures on small businesses already facing utility increases of 52.7%, labour costs up 51.5%, and taxes up 47.2%.

Voted No

Torsten Bell

Labour · Swansea West

Supportive

The cap is necessary, pragmatic, and fair; salary sacrifice costs are exploding (to £8bn/year), benefits disproportionately flow to high earners, and the policy protects 95% of those earning under £30k while giving businesses nearly 4 years to adjust.

Voted Aye

Dan Tomlinson

Labour · Chipping Barnet

Supportive

The cap is fair targeting of a £75bn-per-year relief; low-wage workers cannot access salary sacrifice anyway, so they are unaffected; the long implementation gives businesses time to plan and the OBR costing is dynamic and robust.

Voted Aye

Related Votes

National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Second Reading — Wednesday, 17 December 2025 | Beyond The Vote