Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
174Ayes
292Noes
Defeated · majority 118 · Government won180 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 174 · No 292 · DNV 180 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 11 March 2026, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 11 during the report stage of the Finance (No. 2) Bill -- the legislation enacting the government's budget measures. The clause, proposed by opposition parties, would have added new fiscal provisions to the Bill. It was defeated by 292 votes to 174, with the government's position prevailing comfortably. The Finance (No. 2) Bill is the primary vehicle through which the government translates its budget into law, covering taxation, duties and related fiscal measures. Media coverage in the weeks surrounding this vote focused heavily on Air Passenger Duty, which was set to rise from April 2026, with travellers urged to book flights before 1 April to avoid higher charges. New Clause 11's defeat means the government's original budget proposals on such matters remain intact, without the additional fiscal measures the opposition sought to introduce. The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. All Labour and Labour/Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause (288 combined), while Conservatives (96), Liberal Democrats (53), the SNP (7), Reform UK (7), Plaid Cymru (4) and the DUP (2) all voted in favour -- an unusually broad opposition alliance. Notably, the Greens voted with the government against the clause. The vote sits within a period of sustained parliamentary pressure on Labour's fiscal agenda, including a series of government victories in March 2026 on National Insurance Contributions legislation, where the Commons repeatedly rejected Lords amendments by margins of around 115 votes.
Voting Aye meant
Support indexing agricultural inheritance tax thresholds to inflation and rising land values to protect family farmers from fiscal drag
Voting No meant
Oppose mandatory indexation of agricultural inheritance tax thresholds, preferring to keep fixed thresholds as set in the legislation
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
257
104
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words) →
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words) →
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words) →
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words) →
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words) →
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0