A divisionDivision No. 446 · Wednesday, 11 March 2026· Commons· Taxation

Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11

174Ayes
292Noes
Defeated · majority 118 · Government won
180 did not vote
Aye176No294DID NOT VOTE · 180

646 Members · Aye 174 · No 292 · DNV 180 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 11 March 2026 on New Clause 11 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill, a Liberal Democrat proposal that would have required the thresholds for agricultural property relief (a form of inheritance tax relief available to farmers) to rise each year in line with agricultural land prices. The clause was defeated by 292 votes to 174. The practical effect of the clause, had it passed, would have been to prevent the real value of agricultural property relief thresholds from being eroded over time. Because agricultural land prices tend to rise, fixed thresholds gradually pull more of a farm's value into inheritance tax exposure. The government has decided to freeze these thresholds until the end of the decade, and rejecting New Clause 11 preserves that freeze. The vote affects farming families whose estates may exceed frozen thresholds by an increasing margin as land values grow. The Liberal Democrats brought the proposal forward and pushed it to a division, with Conservatives, Reform UK, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voting in favour. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against. The Greens also voted against. The result followed a pattern seen in related divisions earlier in March 2026, when the government used its Commons majority to reject Lords amendments to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, reflecting a broader determination to protect its revenue-raising strategy from opposition challenges.

Voting Aye meant
Support automatically uprating agricultural property relief thresholds in line with rising land prices, so farmers are not gradually pulled into greater inheritance tax exposure by inflation.
Voting No meant
Reject automatic uprating, backing the government's decision to freeze agricultural relief thresholds until the end of the decade as part of a broader revenue-raising strategy.
§ 01Who voted how.466 voting Members · 180 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
257
104
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
53
0
18
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words)
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words)
Ms Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0