Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 5
172Ayes
283Noes
Defeated · majority 111 · Government won192 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 172 · No 283 · DNV 192 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 11 March 2026 to reject Amendment 5 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill at report stage, defeating a Conservative proposal that would have prevented income tax thresholds from remaining frozen at their current levels until 2030. The amendment fell by 283 votes to 172, a majority of 111 against. The freeze on income tax thresholds means that as wages rise, more taxpayers are pulled into higher tax bands even without any explicit rate increase, a process known as fiscal drag. Amendment 5 sought to end this freeze early. The government argued, citing figures certified by the Office for Budget Responsibility, that reversing the freeze would cost around £12 billion in the fiscal year relevant to its borrowing rules and would put public finances and public service funding at risk. Supporters of the amendment described the freeze as a real-terms tax rise falling on working families. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted sided with the government against the amendment. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour. The SNP did not vote on this amendment, with a Scottish National Party member explaining from the floor that income tax thresholds are a devolved matter and the party would not participate. The vote sits within a broader pattern of the government using its Commons majority to hold its tax and spending plan together, having also defeated Lords amendments to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill on 23 March 2026 across five separate divisions.
Voting Aye meant
Support ending the income tax threshold freeze before 2030, arguing that holding thresholds flat while wages rise drags more people into higher tax bands and constitutes a real-terms tax increase on working families.
Voting No meant
Oppose lifting the threshold freeze early, arguing the measure is necessary to restore fiscal stability, fund public services, and stay within the government's borrowing rules — with the OBR-certified cost of reversal putting £12 billion of revenue at risk.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
253
108
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
52
0
19
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
—
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words) →
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words) →
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words) →
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words) →
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words) →
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0