National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
278Ayes
164Noes
Carried · majority 114 · Government won206 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 278 · No 164 · DNV 206 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 23 March 2026 to reject Lords Amendment 6 to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, which would have exempted small and medium-sized businesses and charities from new National Insurance contributions on salary-sacrifice pension amounts above £2,000 a year. The government's motion to disagree with the Lords passed by 278 votes to 164 (Division 458). The bill will now apply the new NICs charge to all employers, regardless of size, when the measure takes effect from the 2029-30 tax year. The vote means the NIC charge on salary-sacrifice pension contributions above the £2,000 annual threshold will fall on smaller employers and charities just as it will on large firms. The government argued the reform is necessary to control a tax relief whose cost was projected to nearly treble to £8 billion by 2031, and that it benefits mainly higher and additional-rate taxpayers while being unavailable to lower earners and the self-employed. Opponents argued that smaller employers already face a heavy regulatory and financial burden and that removing the exemption would make it harder for SMEs and charities to maintain pension provision for their staff. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously for the government's motion, providing all 274 ayes from those two groups. Conservatives (89 no votes), Liberal Democrats (57), the SNP (5), the DUP (5), Plaid Cymru (3), Reform UK (3), and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted against. Three independents voted with the government and two against. There were no Conservative or Liberal Democrat ayes recorded. The result reflects a clean government-versus-opposition divide, with no visible cross-party rebellion on either side.
Voting Aye meant
Support rejecting the Lords exemption for SMEs and charities, maintaining that new NICs on salary-sacrifice pension contributions above £2,000 should apply to all employers regardless of size
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment exempting small businesses and charities from the new NICs charge on salary-sacrifice pension contributions, citing the cumulative regulatory and tax burden already facing smaller employers
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
249
0
112
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
56
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
25
0
17
Independent
—
3
3
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
5
4
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
0
5
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports the Bill and rejects all Lords amendments; argues the £2,000 cap is pragmatic, protects 90% of lower earners, and necessary to control spiralling tax relief costs while maintaining strong pension incentives.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,464 words) →
Opposes the Bill entirely and supports most Lords amendments; argues the cap will harm 858,000 basic-rate taxpayers and may cause employers to abandon salary sacrifice altogether, damaging pensions adequacy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,221 words) →
Opposes the Bill and supports Lords amendments, particularly raising the cap to £5,000; argues the £2,000 threshold will hit modest-income savers and the timing (2029) appears designed to manage fiscal rules rather than be genuine policy.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,143 words) →
Questions whether the Bill creates a financial disincentive for middle-income earners and may increase pensioner poverty, asking if this risks creating a pensions gap and higher state costs.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (136 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues the government should focus on low earners who cannot afford to save, not tax reliefs for higher earners, and notes concern about the pension gap is more relevant to wage levels than tax changes.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (135 words) →
Challenges the government as unfairly raising taxes on savers while increasing welfare spending; questions the integrity of using the policy to fund other priorities.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (99 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0