The topic lensIssue · 26 divisions tagged · 15 parties active

Pensions.

State and private pensions

Divisions tagged
26
This parliament
Parties active
15
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Social Democratic and Labour Party
100% aligned
Recent activity
10
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on pensions.26 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
+858% on-whip · 358 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-1535% on-whip · 113 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
-248% on-whip · 71 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyLab
+858% on-whip · 42 MPs
IndependentInd
+151% on-whip · 13 MPs
Scottish National PartySNP
+1262% on-whip · 9 MPs
Reform UKRef
+151% on-whip · 8 MPs
Green Party of England and WalesGrn
+2474% on-whip · 5 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent pensions divisions.last 5 · of 26 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
28 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88, insist on Amendments 88C, 88E to 88P, 88R, 88S and 88W, and propose Amendments (a) to (j) in lieu of Amendments 88A, 88T, 88U and 88V
Aye: Support the government retaining a reserve power to set minimum asset allocation targets for defined contribution pension schemes, accepting the government's amendments limiting its scope while rejecting the Lords' attempts to remove it entirely. · No: Oppose giving Ministers the power to direct pension fund investment, siding with the Lords' view that mandating where savers' money is invested is an unacceptable government overreach into pension fund management.
336159Yes
27 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 88Q
Aye: Support giving the government a time-limited reserve power to set minimum private-market asset allocation targets for pension schemes, arguing this will channel pension savings into productive UK investment without overriding savers' interests · No: Oppose mandating pension scheme investment allocations, arguing it risks poor returns for pensioners, amounts to government picking winners, and that the pension industry itself opposes compulsion — preferring facilitation over diktat
280165Yes
22 Apr 2026Pensions Schemes Bill: Govt motion relating to Lords Reason 88D
Aye: Support the government's position on Lords Reason 88D, backing the Commons' stance against the Lords' proposed change to the Pension Schemes Bill · No: Oppose the government's motion, effectively siding with the Lords' reasoning or amendment on this aspect of the Pension Schemes Bill
270151Yes
15 Apr 2026Pensions Scheme Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
Aye: Support the government's decision to reject the Lords' amendment and restore the original bill text on this pension-related provision · No: Support retaining the Lords' amendment and accepting the change the upper chamber made to the Pensions Scheme Bill
271104Yes
15 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 15
Aye: Support removing the Lords amendment and keeping the government's reserve power to direct pension fund asset allocation, on the basis that it is necessary to unlock investment in private markets and improve returns for savers. · No: Oppose the government's power to direct private pension investments, arguing that Ministers should not be able to override the fiduciary duty of pension trustees or force savers' money into assets that may not serve their best interests.
278156Yes

All 26 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on pensions is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where pensions money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Pensions” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 26 divisions