Pensions.
State and private pensions
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +4 | 54% on-whip · 358 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -11 | 39% on-whip · 113 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +2 | 52% on-whip · 72 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | +5 | 55% on-whip · 42 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +2 | 52% on-whip · 13 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | +15 | 65% on-whip · 9 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | +8 | 58% on-whip · 8 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +33 | 83% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88, insist on Amendments 88C, 88E to 88P, 88R, 88S and 88W, and propose Amendments (a) to (j) in lieu of Amendments 88A, 88T, 88U and 88V Aye: Support giving ministers a time-limited reserve power to mandate pension fund asset allocation if voluntary investment targets fail, arguing this underpins the Mansion House accord and ultimately serves savers' interests · No: Oppose government power to direct pension fund investments, arguing mandation risks poor returns for pensioners, represents inappropriate state interference in investment decisions, and that the pension industry itself has grave concerns | 336 | 159 | Yes |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 88Q Aye: Support the Commons position rejecting the Lords' reason for Amendment 88Q to the Pension Schemes Bill · No: Support the Lords' position and their stated reason for Amendment 88Q to the Pension Schemes Bill | 280 | 165 | Yes |
| 22 Apr 2026 | Pensions Schemes Bill: Govt motion relating to Lords Reason 88D Aye: Support the government's position in rejecting or modifying the Lords' amendment 88D to the Pension Schemes Bill · No: Support the Lords' position on amendment 88D, opposing the government's response to the upper chamber | 270 | 151 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 77 Aye: Support rejecting the Lords' call for a review of public sector pension costs and sustainability, keeping the Bill as the government intended · No: Support the Lords amendment requiring a review of public sector pension scheme costs and long-term sustainability, arguing greater transparency is needed about taxpayer liabilities | 272 | 96 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 43 Aye: Support the government's decision to reject Lords Amendment 43 to the Pension Schemes Bill, maintaining the Commons' version of the pension reform legislation · No: Support keeping Lords Amendment 43, backing the change the House of Lords made to the Pension Schemes Bill | 275 | 160 | Yes |
All 26 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on pensions is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Ed Miliband | Doncaster North | 100% |
| Olivia Bailey | Reading West and Mid Berkshire | 85% |
| Louise Sandher-Jones | North East Derbyshire | 83% |
ConConservative and Unionist Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Shivani Raja | Leicester East | 86% |
| Kemi Badenoch | North West Essex | 67% |
| Mark Pritchard | The Wrekin | 67% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Tom Morrison | Cheadle | 83% |
| Chris Coghlan | Dorking and Horley | 79% |
| Lisa Smart | Hazel Grove | 75% |
IndLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Kirsty McNeill | Midlothian | 90% |
| Simon Lightwood | Wakefield and Rothwell | 88% |
| Andrew Pakes | Peterborough | 80% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Easton | North Down | 67% |
| Jeremy Corbyn | Islington North | 67% |
| Adnan Hussain | Blackburn | 64% |
SNPScottish National Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Kirsty Blackman | Aberdeen North | 100% |
| Pete Wishart | Perth and Kinross-shire | 85% |
| Dave Doogan | Angus and Perthshire Glens | 79% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Pensions” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.