Pension Schemes Bill: Government Motion relating to Lords Reason 88X
335
Ayes
—
158
Noes
Passed · Government won
155 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons passed a government motion relating to Lords amendments to the Pension Schemes Bill on 28 April 2026, by 335 votes to 158. The motion was part of the "ping-pong" process, in which a bill bounces between the Commons and Lords until both chambers agree on its final text. The government's position prevailed comfortably. The Pension Schemes Bill is significant legislation affecting how occupational and private pensions are governed, regulated, and paid out in the United Kingdom. The Lords had amended the bill and this vote formed part of the Commons' response to those amendments, either rejecting or modifying what the upper chamber had proposed. The outcome keeps the government's preferred version of the bill on track to become law, with practical consequences for pension scheme members, trustees, and employers across the country. ** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided 325 of the 335 Aye votes, with the Scottish National Party adding 9 and one independent contributing the remainder. All 97 voting Conservatives and all 54 voting Liberal Democrats opposed the motion, joined by the Democratic Unionist Party and Traditional Unionist Voice. There were no Labour rebels. This vote was the latest in a series of closely related divisions stretching back to 15 April 2026, in which the government consistently won by similar margins, suggesting the Lords amendments were being systematically rejected or replaced as the bill moved toward final passage.
Voting Aye meant
Support giving ministers a time-limited reserve power to mandate pension fund asset allocation if voluntary investment targets fail, arguing this underpins the Mansion House accord and ultimately serves savers' interests
Voting No meant
Oppose government power to direct pension fund investments, arguing mandation risks poor returns for pensioners, represents inappropriate state interference in investment decisions, and that the pension industry itself has grave concerns
493 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 155 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
292
0
70
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
97
19
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
54
18
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
1
2
10
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9
0
—
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
—
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
5
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0