A divisionDivision No. 377 · Wednesday, 3 December 2025· Commons· Pensions

Pension Schemes Bill: New Clause 3

87Ayes
299Noes
Defeated · majority 212 · Government won
263 did not vote
Aye89No297DID NOT VOTE · 263

649 Members · Aye 87 · No 299 · DNV 263 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 3 December 2025, Parliament voted on New Clause 3 to the Pension Schemes Bill, which would have required the Department for Work and Pensions to share SR1 forms (the standard end-of-life medical certificates) with the Pension Protection Fund and the Financial Assistance Scheme, so that terminally ill people would not need to resubmit proof of their diagnosis when claiming compensation. The clause would also have required payments to be made within a defined timeframe once eligibility was confirmed. The amendment was defeated by 299 votes to 87. The practical effect of the clause, had it passed, would have been to remove a layer of administrative repetition for people in the final months of their lives. As it stands, someone who has already had their terminal illness accepted by the DWP may still need to provide fresh documentation to the PPF or FAS separately. The Bill already extends the terminal illness definition in the PPF from six to twelve months life expectancy, but New Clause 3 went further by addressing the process through which eligibility is demonstrated, aiming to cut duplication and speed up payments. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 294 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the clause. Support came from the Liberal Democrats, who provided 62 of the 87 Aye votes, with further backing from the SNP, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the DUP, and two Conservatives. The Conservatives as a group had 114 members with no vote recorded. The government's opposition likely reflects its preference for the terminal illness provisions already in the Bill rather than adding this additional administrative requirement.

Voting Aye meant
Support simplifying access to pension compensation for terminally ill people by sharing existing SR1 forms across government bodies, removing the need for repeated paperwork at end of life.
Voting No meant
Oppose this specific amendment, likely preferring the government's own provisions extending the terminal illness definition in the PPF from six to twelve months rather than adding this additional administrative requirement.
§ 01Who voted how.386 voting Members · 263 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
267
94
Conservative and Unionist Party
2
0
114
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
27
15
Independent
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
4
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0