Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading

Tuesday, 3 February 2026 · Division No. 424 · Commons

458Ayes
104Noes
Passed

84 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonAnti Two Child Benefit Cap(Yes)Pro Welfare Expansion(Yes)Pro Child Poverty Reduction(Yes)Fiscal Responsibility(No)

Voting Yes means

Support removing the two-child limit on Universal Credit, allowing families to receive welfare support for all their children and reducing child poverty

Voting No means

Oppose removing the two-child limit, arguing it encourages personal responsibility and that the state should not subsidise choices to have larger families

What happened: On 3 February 2026, the House of Commons passed the Second Reading of the Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill by 458 votes to 104. Second Reading is the stage at which MPs debate and vote on the general principles of a Bill, so this result meant Parliament approved the core idea of removing the two-child limit on Universal Credit -- the rule that restricts child elements of the benefit to the first two children in a family -- and allowed the Bill to proceed to further scrutiny.

Why it matters: The two-child limit, introduced in 2017, means families with three or more children do not receive Universal Credit support for any child beyond the second. Removing it would restore payments for all children in eligible households, directly affecting hundreds of thousands of families and their children who are currently in, or at risk of, poverty. The Bill also removes the so-called "rape clause" -- a controversial exemption that required women to declare a third or subsequent child was conceived through rape in order to claim support for that child. Charities including the Child Poverty Action Group and the Trussell Trust have long argued the limit is a leading driver of child poverty in the UK.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All voting Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs backed the Bill (361 combined), as did the Liberal Democrats (62), SNP (8), Plaid Cymru (4), the Greens (4), and the DUP (4). The Conservatives voted almost unanimously against, providing 99 of the 104 No votes. Reform UK split, with 5 voting against and 2 in favour. One point of political tension was raised by the Conservative benches: the Bill was not in Labour's 2024 general election manifesto, and Chancellor Rachel Reeves had previously ruled out removing the cap -- making this a notable shift in government policy since the election.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
325 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/99 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
36 Aye/0 No
Independent
9 Aye/2 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8 Aye/0 No
Reform UKFree vote
2 Aye/5 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2 Aye/0 No
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

Sir Oliver Dowden

Conservative · Hertsmere

Opposed

The two-child limit was a principled policy reflecting individual responsibility; removing it forces working people to pay higher taxes while subsidising choices others cannot afford.

Voted No

Helen Whately

Conservative · Faversham and Mid Kent

Opposed

The cap is fair and necessary; lifting it creates a poverty trap where households receive more in untaxed benefits than working families earn, disincentivises work, and represents a U-turn driven by Prime Minister weakness.

Voted No

Dr Neil Shastri-Hurst

Conservative · Solihull West and Shirley

Opposed

Poverty is conquered by work, education and ambition, not cheque books; this Bill abandons financial responsibility, weakens welfare legitimacy, and lacks any strategy for moving people into employment.

Voted No

Pat McFadden

Labour · Wolverhampton South East

Supportive

The two-child limit was always a political exercise; removing it is essential as it will lift hundreds of thousands of children from poverty and is funded through fraud savings, Motability reforms, and gambling tax changes.

Voted Aye

Debbie Abrahams

Labour · Oldham East and Saddleworth

Supportive

Child poverty causes measurable harm including infant mortality and neurological damage; the Conservatives ignored repeated warnings and this Bill is a crucial first step, though more must be done.

Voted Aye

Steve Darling

Liberal Democrat · Torbay

Supportive

The two-child limit is Dickensian and morally bankrupt; children are not responsible for circumstances beyond their control and deserve support to reach their potential.

Voted Aye

Kirsty Blackman

SNP · Aberdeen North

Supportive

The SNP has been consistent in opposing the two-child cap; this removal is necessary but insufficient without deeper ambition to match Scottish child poverty policies and targets.

Voted Aye

Janet Daby

Labour · Lewisham East

Supportive

Teachers and families are struggling; removing the cap alongside broader measures like expanded childcare and workers' rights creates a comprehensive anti-poverty strategy.

Voted Aye

Related Votes