Pension Schemes Bill: Amendment 16
Wednesday, 3 December 2025 · Division No. 379 · Commons
200 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the Conservative amendment to the Pension Schemes Bill, seeking to alter or add to the government's pension reform legislation
Voting No means
Reject the Conservative amendment, backing the government's version of the Pension Schemes Bill without this change
What happened: On 3 December 2025, MPs voted on Amendment 16 to the Pension Schemes Bill at its report stage (the stage where the full House of Commons reviews and can amend a bill after it has been scrutinised in committee). The amendment was tabled by the Conservative opposition and sought to modify the government's pension proposals. It was defeated by 304 votes to 143, with the government's position prevailing.
Why it matters: The Pension Schemes Bill is a significant piece of legislation affecting millions of people with occupational and private pensions across the United Kingdom. Among its most prominent measures are new clauses introduced by the government to provide prospective indexation of Pension Protection Fund and Financial Assistance Scheme payments relating to pensions built up before 6 April 1997, linked to the Consumer Prices Index and capped at 2.5%. The government stated this change would benefit over 250,000 members, boosting average compensation by around 400 pounds a year over five years. By defeating the opposition amendment, the Commons backed the government's version of these reforms rather than the modified approach proposed by the Conservatives.
The politics: The vote divided along clear party lines. All 298 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while all 74 Conservatives, all 62 Liberal Democrats, and all 5 Reform UK members who voted supported it. There were no cross-party rebels on either side of note, though six independents voted with the government against the amendment. The Bill has proceeded with a degree of cross-party support on broad principles, with the Conservative shadow minister and the Liberal Democrats both acknowledging positive elements of the legislation, but the opposition sought through amendments to strengthen or adjust specific provisions. The defeat of Amendment 16 reflects the government's comfortable Commons majority on its legislative programme.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Didcot and Wantage
Welcomes PPF improvements but expresses concern that AEA Technology pension campaigners lack redress route despite NAO/Select Committee reports; urges reconsideration of new clause 1.
Conservative · New Forest East
Notes ExxonMobil private DB scheme pensioners feel discriminated against as they gain no benefit from FAS/PPF indexation improvements; questions whether trustees have sufficient leverage against foreign-headquartered employers.
Voted Aye
Labour · Llanelli
Expresses scepticism about whether surplus release changes will actually force companies like 3M and Hewlett Packard to provide index-linked rises; seeks meeting to understand available mechanisms.
Voted No
Conservative · Surrey Heath
Seeks reassurance for Surrey Heath constituents working for large US firms whose pensions fall outside PPF/FAS and receive no pre-1997 uplift.
Voted Aye
Conservative · North West Norfolk
Supports many Bill measures for pension accessibility but criticises that it fails to address pension adequacy; over 50% of savers will miss retirement income targets; proposes five-year review requirement via new clause 25.
Voted Aye
SNP · Aberdeen North
Welcomes trustee guidance proposal but requests clear timeline and roadmap for consultation and resulting primary/secondary legislation.
Labour · Swansea West
Supports Bill as foundation for pension returns; announces prospective CPI-linked indexation (capped 2.5%) for PPF/FAS pre-1997 service and promises statutory guidance on trustee investment duties rather than primary legislation changes.
Voted No
Labour · Banbury
Welcomes Chancellor's Budget announcement on pensions; praises government action after decades of Conservative delay; seeks confirmation of benefit amounts from indexation changes.
Voted No
Related Votes
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
23 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
23 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading
3 Feb 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Third Reading
21 Jan 2026
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Second Reading
17 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: New Clause 3
3 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: New Clause 26
3 Dec 2025
Pension Schemes Bill: Amendment 15
3 Dec 2025