Victims and Courts Bill Report Stage: Amendment 5
Monday, 27 October 2025 · Division No. 328 · Commons
164 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support expanding compensation rights for child sexual abuse victims, including those whose own criminal records stem from their abuse circumstances
Voting No means
Oppose this particular amendment, likely preferring the government's own approach (New Clause 14 on parental responsibility) or opposing the specific eligibility changes proposed
What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 5 to the Victims and Courts Bill at Report Stage on 27 October 2025. The amendment was defeated by 332 votes to 153. Report Stage is the point in the legislative process where the full House considers proposed changes to a Bill that has already passed through Committee scrutiny.
Why it matters: The Victims and Courts Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation aimed at reforming how the criminal justice system treats victims of crime. The Bill includes measures on compelling convicted criminals to attend their sentencing hearings, restricting parental responsibility for rapists over children conceived through their crime, voiding non-disclosure agreements that silence victims of crime, and expanding the victim contact scheme. Amendment 5 sought to change specific provisions within these reforms, but the government successfully argued against it, and the Bill will proceed without that amendment incorporated.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 321 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives (81), Liberal Democrats (59), Plaid Cymru (4), Reform UK (4), the Democratic Unionist Party (3), and the Ulster Unionist Party (1) all voted in favour. The Greens voted with the government against the amendment. One independent voted for the amendment while seven voted against it. There were no Labour rebels. The defeat of the amendment reflects the government's commanding Commons majority, and the Bill's broader passage has been marked by cross-party collaboration on several of its headline measures, even where specific amendment proposals were rejected.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Bristol East
New clause 2 should require courts to identify children affected by parental imprisonment at sentencing; existing statutory guidance is non-binding and children remain unsupported; 190,000 children affected annually but no clear timeline for government delivery on manifesto commitment.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Horsham
Bill's domestic abuse support welcome but incomplete without concrete measures improving court capacity; victims arriving for trial only to have case pulled due to lack of capacity demonstrates systemic failure that legislation alone cannot fix.
Voted Aye
Labour · Pontypridd
Bill delivers real, tangible victim protection measures including restricting parental responsibility for rapists, voiding NDAs that silence victims, and improving court processes; opposes widening some provisions (e.g. removing sentencing threshold) to avoid overwhelming family courts and to test the approach carefully before expansion.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Chichester
Welcomes the Bill's victim-centred approach but identifies gaps: victim contact scheme should extend to offenders serving less than 12 months, all victims need free court transcripts, government should make statements on victim reviews within two weeks, and local authorities must prepare victim support strategies to prevent postcode lotteries.
Voted Aye
Labour · Maidenhead
New clause 12 essential to end anomaly where families of murder victims killed abroad receive no structured statutory support while domestic victims do; bereaved families navigate foreign legal systems alone and deserve same baseline victim code protections as domestic cases.
Voted Aye
Labour · Bolsover
Government new clause 14 corrects historic injustice by preventing rapists from exercising parental responsibility over children conceived through rape; law change validates survivor testimony and uses law to protect women and children.
Voted No
Labour · Sheffield Heeley
Amendment on parental responsibility corrects injustice where children are protected from convicted sex offenders but their own children are not; government taking steps to protect both children and parents from vile sex offenders.
Voted No
Labour · St Helens South and Whiston
Victim impact statements currently too restrictive; Violet-Grace Youens' parents felt silenced by court limitations on what could be said; victim statements are important for victims to be heard and acknowledged.
Voted No
Related Votes
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial) Order 2025
21 Jan 2026
Sentencing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 7
20 Jan 2026
Draft Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025
14 Jan 2026
Opposition Day: Jury trials
7 Jan 2026
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 12
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 20
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill: Third Reading
29 Oct 2025
Victims and Courts Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
27 Oct 2025