Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19

Wednesday, 29 October 2025 · Division No. 334 · Commons

173Ayes
323Noes
Defeated

155 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedIpp Prisoner Reform(Yes)Homicide Law Reform(Yes)Pro Sentencing Review(No)Tough On Crime(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support pushing ahead with homicide law reform and mandatory re-sentencing of IPP prisoners now, rather than waiting for further reviews

Voting No means

Oppose legislating ahead of the Law Commission's homicide review, and reject the mandatory IPP re-sentencing timetable as proposed

What happened: The House of Commons voted on 29 October 2025 on New Clause 19, an amendment to the Sentencing Bill tabled by Conservative MPs, which would have modified sentencing provisions relating to the murder of police or prison officers killed in the course of their duties. The amendment was defeated by 323 votes to 173, with the government's position prevailing.

Why it matters: New Clause 19 sought to ensure that offenders who murder a police or prison officer specifically because of that officer's professional role would face the fullest available sentencing consequences. Its defeat means the Sentencing Bill proceeds without that specific provision. The broader bill itself is the government's flagship response to a prison capacity crisis, introducing an earned progression model for release, reforms to short-term sentences, and intensive supervision courts. The Sentencing Bill affects sentencing across England and Wales, with implications for prison population projections that the government has indicated could exceed 100,000 within three years without reform.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the amendment, while all 94 voting Conservatives, all 63 voting Liberal Democrats, all 7 voting Reform UK members, and all 4 voting Plaid Cymru members voted in favour. The Greens, unusually, sided with the government, casting 4 votes against the amendment. This cross-opposition alliance in favour of the amendment was insufficient to overcome Labour's majority. The Conservatives used the debate to attack the government's approach as insufficiently tough on serious offenders, while Labour ministers defended the bill as building on evidence, including evidence commissioned by the previous Conservative government, and pointed to what they described as the previous administration's record of sentence inflation without corresponding prison capacity.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/277 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
63 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/33 No
Independent
2 Aye/5 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Dr Kieran Mullan

Conservative · Bexhill and Battle

Opposed

Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.

Voted Aye

Liz Saville Roberts

Plaid Cymru · Dwyfor Meirionnydd

Questioning

Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.

Voted Aye

Mr Peter Bedford

Labour · Mid Leicestershire

Supportive

Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.

Voted Aye

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.

Voted No

Andy Slaughter

Labour · Hammersmith and Chiswick

Supportive

Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.

Voted No

Lewis Cocking

Unknown · Broxbourne

Supportive

Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.

Voted Aye

Related Votes