Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19
173Ayes
323Noes
Defeated · majority 150 · Government won155 did not vote
651 Members · Aye 173 · No 323 · DNV 155 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 29 October 2025 on New Clause 19, an amendment to the Sentencing Bill tabled by Conservative MPs, which would have modified sentencing provisions relating to the murder of police or prison officers killed in the course of their duties. The amendment was defeated by 323 votes to 173, with the government's position prevailing. New Clause 19 sought to ensure that offenders who murder a police or prison officer specifically because of that officer's professional role would face the fullest available sentencing consequences. Its defeat means the Sentencing Bill proceeds without that specific provision. The broader bill itself is the government's flagship response to a prison capacity crisis, introducing an earned progression model for release, reforms to short-term sentences, and intensive supervision courts. The Sentencing Bill affects sentencing across England and Wales, with implications for prison population projections that the government has indicated could exceed 100,000 within three years without reform. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the amendment, while all 94 voting Conservatives, all 63 voting Liberal Democrats, all 7 voting Reform UK members, and all 4 voting Plaid Cymru members voted in favour. The Greens, unusually, sided with the government, casting 4 votes against the amendment. This cross-opposition alliance in favour of the amendment was insufficient to overcome Labour's majority. The Conservatives used the debate to attack the government's approach as insufficiently tough on serious offenders, while Labour ministers defended the bill as building on evidence, including evidence commissioned by the previous Conservative government, and pointed to what they described as the previous administration's record of sentence inflation without corresponding prison capacity.
Voting Aye meant
Support pushing ahead with homicide law reform and mandatory re-sentencing of IPP prisoners now, rather than waiting for further reviews
Voting No meant
Oppose legislating ahead of the Law Commission's homicide review, and reject the mandatory IPP re-sentencing timetable as proposed
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0