Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19
173Ayes
323Noes
Defeated · majority 150 · Government won155 did not vote
651 Members · Aye 173 · No 323 · DNV 155 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament defeated a Conservative amendment to the Sentencing Bill on 29 October 2025, voting 323 to 173 against New Clause 19, which would have introduced mandatory life sentences for anyone convicted of murdering a police officer or prison officer. The new clause sought to create a statutory requirement that courts impose life sentences in cases where the victim of a murder is a serving police or prison officer. Supporters argued this would send a clear signal that killing those who protect the public carries the harshest available punishment. The government opposed it, with a minister telling the House that the Law Commission is currently conducting a review of homicide law and that it would be wrong to pre-empt that process. Ministers also noted that existing powers already allow courts to impose life sentences in such cases, and that in a specific case raised during debate the offender had in fact received life imprisonment with a minimum 45-year tariff. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the new clause. Conservatives provided 94 of the 173 ayes, joined by all 63 voting Liberal Democrats, 7 Reform UK MPs, 4 Plaid Cymru MPs, and 1 Traditional Unionist Voice MP. The Liberal Democrats' support for the amendment represented a cross-party alliance with the Conservatives on this specific measure. No Labour MP voted in favour, and the Greens and the SDLP voted with the government. The result came on a day of multiple contested divisions at Report Stage of the Sentencing Bill, including a near-identical voting pattern on New Clause 1 earlier the same day, which fell 328 to 170.
Voting Aye meant
Support introducing mandatory life sentences for those who murder police or prison officers, sending a clear signal that attacks on public servants who protect society carry the harshest consequences.
Voting No meant
Oppose pre-empting the Law Commission's review of homicide law with a targeted mandatory sentencing provision, while maintaining that existing life sentence powers already cover such cases.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
2
5
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0