Victims and Courts Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
Monday, 27 October 2025 · Division No. 325 · Commons
157 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support giving victims greater freedom to express themselves in victim personal statements, enshrining broader rights in legislation rather than leaving them to guidance
Voting No means
Oppose this specific amendment, likely preferring the Government's own approach (New Clause 14 and other government provisions) to reforming victim rights rather than the opposition's version
What happened: The House of Commons voted on New Clause 4 to the Victims and Courts Bill during the bill's Report Stage on 27 October 2025. The clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, was defeated by 337 votes to 152. The Victims and Courts Bill as a whole was proceeding through its Report Stage, a parliamentary phase where the full House considers amendments to legislation already examined in committee.
Why it matters: The Victims and Courts Bill is a substantial piece of legislation aimed at reforming how the criminal justice system treats victims, covering areas including victim impact statements, parental responsibility for convicted rapists, non-disclosure agreements, and support services for survivors of domestic abuse and sexual violence. New Clause 4 specifically concerned families of British nationals murdered abroad, a group currently excluded from protections and entitlements set out in the Victims' Code. Around 80 families each year are affected by this gap, and the clause sought to extend statutory support to them as they navigate unfamiliar foreign legal systems, often receiving news of their loved one's death through journalists rather than official channels. Its defeat means this extension of the code does not form part of the bill as it progresses.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 323 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while all 81 Conservatives and all 62 Liberal Democrats who voted supported it. Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted in favour. No Conservative or Liberal Democrat voted against, and no Labour MP voted in favour, making this a near-perfect party whip exercise on both sides. The government's own bill attracted considerable cross-party praise during the debate, particularly for Government New Clause 14 restricting rapists' parental responsibility over children conceived through rape, but opposition amendments including New Clause 4 were uniformly rejected. The Liberal Democrat MP for Maidenhead had tabled New Clause 12 on the same subject of British nationals murdered abroad, and Conservative shadow minister Dr Kieran Mullan spoke in support of that campaign during the debate, but the government maintained that its existing provisions were sufficient and that the amendment was unnecessary.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Bristol East
New clause 2 should require courts to identify children affected by parental imprisonment at sentencing; existing statutory guidance is non-binding and children remain unsupported; 190,000 children affected annually but no clear timeline for government delivery on manifesto commitment.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Horsham
Bill's domestic abuse support welcome but incomplete without concrete measures improving court capacity; victims arriving for trial only to have case pulled due to lack of capacity demonstrates systemic failure that legislation alone cannot fix.
Voted Aye
Labour · Pontypridd
Bill delivers real, tangible victim protection measures including restricting parental responsibility for rapists, voiding NDAs that silence victims, and improving court processes; opposes widening some provisions (e.g. removing sentencing threshold) to avoid overwhelming family courts and to test the approach carefully before expansion.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Chichester
Welcomes the Bill's victim-centred approach but identifies gaps: victim contact scheme should extend to offenders serving less than 12 months, all victims need free court transcripts, government should make statements on victim reviews within two weeks, and local authorities must prepare victim support strategies to prevent postcode lotteries.
Voted Aye
Labour · Maidenhead
New clause 12 essential to end anomaly where families of murder victims killed abroad receive no structured statutory support while domestic victims do; bereaved families navigate foreign legal systems alone and deserve same baseline victim code protections as domestic cases.
Voted Aye
Labour · Bolsover
Government new clause 14 corrects historic injustice by preventing rapists from exercising parental responsibility over children conceived through rape; law change validates survivor testimony and uses law to protect women and children.
Voted No
Labour · Sheffield Heeley
Amendment on parental responsibility corrects injustice where children are protected from convicted sex offenders but their own children are not; government taking steps to protect both children and parents from vile sex offenders.
Voted No
Labour · St Helens South and Whiston
Victim impact statements currently too restrictive; Violet-Grace Youens' parents felt silenced by court limitations on what could be said; victim statements are important for victims to be heard and acknowledged.
Voted No
Related Votes
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial) Order 2025
21 Jan 2026
Sentencing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 7
20 Jan 2026
Draft Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025
14 Jan 2026
Opposition Day: Jury trials
7 Jan 2026
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 12
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 20
29 Oct 2025
Sentencing Bill: Third Reading
29 Oct 2025
Victims and Courts Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7
27 Oct 2025