Sentencing Bill: Third Reading
321Ayes
103Noes
Carried · majority 218 · Government won226 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 321 · No 103 · DNV 226 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament passed the Sentencing Bill at its Third Reading on 29 October 2025, by 321 votes to 103. The bill had cleared all its Commons stages and now moved to the Lords for scrutiny. The result was never seriously in doubt, with the government commanding a large majority, but the size of the opposition bloc reflected sustained Conservative and Reform UK resistance. The bill makes substantial changes to how courts sentence offenders and how prisoners are released. It creates a presumption that custodial sentences of 12 months or less should be suspended rather than served immediately, extends the ceiling for suspended sentences from two to three years, and resets the point at which standard-sentence prisoners are released. It also removes the minimum period foreign national prisoners must serve before being deported, abolishes Post Sentence Supervision, and introduces new ministerial oversight of the Sentencing Council, requiring joint sign-off from the Lord Chancellor and the Lady Chief Justice before guidelines take effect. The bill primarily affects England and Wales, with some provisions applying UK-wide for national security offences. All 274 Labour MPs and 29 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted in favour, joined by all four Plaid Cymru MPs, all four Green MPs, two Liberal Democrats, and a handful of independents and smaller-party MPs. All 93 voting Conservatives and all seven voting Reform UK members voted against. Seventy Liberal Democrats had no vote recorded. The Conservatives and Reform UK argued the bill was too lenient on offenders; some Labour backbenchers used the debate to press for assurances against privatisation of probation and community service. The bill was passed at the same sitting as Report Stage, where a Conservative new clause on parenting orders for parents of young offenders was defeated 170 to 328.
Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Sentencing Bill, backing reforms to reduce short custodial sentences, restructure prisoner release, and give ministers more control over sentencing guidelines.
Voting No meant
Oppose the Sentencing Bill in its current form, with critics arguing it goes too soft on offenders, insufficiently addresses youth crime, or fails to adequately protect probation services from privatisation.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
274
0
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
93
23
Liberal Democrats
—
2
0
69
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
—
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0