Sentencing Bill: Third Reading

Wednesday, 29 October 2025 · Division No. 336 · Commons

321Ayes
103Noes
Passed

226 MPs did not vote

centreGovernment wonSentencing Reform(Yes)Ipp Sentence Reform(Yes)Youth Justice Intervention(Yes)Tough On Crime(No)

Voting Yes means

Support passing the Sentencing Bill into law, including its provisions on sentencing reform, youth justice measures, and potentially addressing the IPP sentencing backlog

Voting No means

Oppose the Sentencing Bill in its current form, potentially arguing it does not go far enough on IPP reform, is too soft on crime, or raises other concerns about the legislation

What happened: The House of Commons passed the Sentencing Bill at its Third Reading on 29 October 2025, by 321 votes to 103. Third Reading is the final stage in the Commons, representing a vote on the bill as a whole after all amendments have been considered. The bill passed comfortably, clearing the way for it to proceed to the House of Lords.

Why it matters: The Sentencing Bill makes wide-ranging changes to how courts sentence offenders and how the prison system operates. It introduces an earned progression model for release, reforms to short-term sentences, and measures aimed at tackling reoffending through rehabilitation and intensive supervision courts. The government argues the bill is necessary to address an acute prison capacity crisis, while also building what it describes as the largest prison expansion programme since the Victorian era. Critics argue it amounts to early release for serious offenders and weakens public protection.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 303 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the bill, while all 93 voting Conservatives and all 7 voting Reform UK members opposed it. Smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Liberal Democrats largely voted in favour or abstained. The Conservatives and Reform UK framed their opposition around public protection and the risk of releasing dangerous offenders early, while the government defended the bill as evidence-based reform. The bill had already been subject to a series of contested votes at earlier stages, including a report stage division on 29 October where a Conservative new clause was defeated by 328 votes to 170.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
274 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/93 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
29 Aye/0 No
Reform UKWhipped No
0 Aye/7 No
Independent
4 Aye/2 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Liberal Democrats
2 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

Dr Kieran Mullan

Conservative · Bexhill and Battle

Opposed

Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.

Voted No

Liz Saville Roberts

Plaid Cymru · Dwyfor Meirionnydd

Questioning

Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.

Voted Aye

Mr Peter Bedford

Labour · Mid Leicestershire

Supportive

Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.

Voted No

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.

Voted Aye

Andy Slaughter

Labour · Hammersmith and Chiswick

Supportive

Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.

Voted Aye

Lewis Cocking

Unknown · Broxbourne

Supportive

Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.

Voted No

Related Votes