A divisionDivision No. 336 · Wednesday, 29 October 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill: Third Reading

321Ayes
103Noes
Carried · majority 218 · Government won
226 did not vote
Aye320No103DID NOT VOTE · 226

650 Members · Aye 321 · No 103 · DNV 226 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons passed the Sentencing Bill at its Third Reading on 29 October 2025, by 321 votes to 103. Third Reading is the final stage in the Commons, representing a vote on the bill as a whole after all amendments have been considered. The bill passed comfortably, clearing the way for it to proceed to the House of Lords. The Sentencing Bill makes wide-ranging changes to how courts sentence offenders and how the prison system operates. It introduces an earned progression model for release, reforms to short-term sentences, and measures aimed at tackling reoffending through rehabilitation and intensive supervision courts. The government argues the bill is necessary to address an acute prison capacity crisis, while also building what it describes as the largest prison expansion programme since the Victorian era. Critics argue it amounts to early release for serious offenders and weakens public protection. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 303 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the bill, while all 93 voting Conservatives and all 7 voting Reform UK members opposed it. Smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Liberal Democrats largely voted in favour or abstained. The Conservatives and Reform UK framed their opposition around public protection and the risk of releasing dangerous offenders early, while the government defended the bill as evidence-based reform. The bill had already been subject to a series of contested votes at earlier stages, including a report stage division on 29 October where a Conservative new clause was defeated by 328 votes to 170.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Sentencing Bill into law, including its provisions on sentencing reform, youth justice measures, and potentially addressing the IPP sentencing backlog
Voting No meant
Oppose the Sentencing Bill in its current form, potentially arguing it does not go far enough on IPP reform, is too soft on crime, or raises other concerns about the legislation
§ 01Who voted how.424 voting Members · 226 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
274
0
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
93
23
Liberal Democrats
2
0
70
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Mr Peter BedfordSupportiveMid Leicestershire
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,070 words)
Dr Kieran MullanOpposedBexhill and Battle
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,735 words)
John McDonnellSupportiveHayes and Harlington
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (619 words)
Liz Saville RobertsQuestioningDwyfor Meirionnydd
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words)
Andy SlaughterSupportiveHammersmith and Chiswick
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (294 words)
Lewis CockingSupportiveBroxbourne
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (87 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0