Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
170Ayes
328Noes
Defeated · majority 158 · Government won149 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 170 · No 328 · DNV 149 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 29 October 2025 on New Clause 1 to the Sentencing Bill, tabled by Conservative MP Mr Peter Bedford. The new clause was defeated by 328 votes to 170. New Clause 1 concerned parental involvement and accountability in cases of youth offending, specifically seeking an assessment of existing powers and recommendations for improvement in cases where children commit serious crimes. The result reflected near-total party discipline, with Labour and its Co-operative Party partners voting unanimously against and the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and Reform UK voting in favour. The Sentencing Bill is a substantial piece of legislation designed to address a prison capacity crisis, reform short custodial sentences, and introduce new rehabilitation and supervision frameworks. New Clause 1 sought to add an accountability mechanism concerning parental responsibility in youth offending, prompted in part by high-profile constituency cases involving violent crimes committed by very young people. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds without that additional requirement. The broader Bill continues to advance measures including an earned progression model for release, intensive supervision courts, and an expanded prison building programme, all of which the government argues will both relieve overcrowding and reduce reoffending rates. The vote followed strict party lines. All 311 voting Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs opposed the amendment, while 97 Conservatives, 65 Liberal Democrats, and 7 Reform UK MPs backed it, forming an unusual cross-party opposition coalition. Despite this numerical opposition bloc, the government's majority was comfortable at 158 votes. Plaid Cymru and the Greens voted with the government. The debate ranged well beyond New Clause 1 itself, touching on youth anonymity, sentencing guidelines, probation privatisation, child cruelty registers, and Crown Court sitting day caps, illustrating the broad political contest surrounding the Bill at its Report Stage.
Voting Aye meant
Support adding new provisions to the Sentencing Bill, including mandatory re-sentencing of IPP prisoners within 18 months and stricter sentencing for young offenders who commit serious crimes, including removing their anonymity
Voting No meant
Oppose these new clauses, likely preferring to keep existing sentencing frameworks and the government's own approach to IPP reform and youth justice
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
280
81
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
97
0
19
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted no · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0