Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1

Wednesday, 29 October 2025 · Division No. 332 · Commons

170Ayes
328Noes
Defeated

149 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedTough On Crime(Yes)Ipp Resentencing Reform(Yes)Youth Offender Anonymity Removal(Yes)Pro Custodial Sentencing(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support adding new provisions to the Sentencing Bill, including mandatory re-sentencing of IPP prisoners within 18 months and stricter sentencing for young offenders who commit serious crimes, including removing their anonymity

Voting No means

Oppose these new clauses, likely preferring to keep existing sentencing frameworks and the government's own approach to IPP reform and youth justice

What happened: The House of Commons voted on 29 October 2025 on New Clause 1 to the Sentencing Bill, tabled by Conservative MP Mr Peter Bedford. The new clause was defeated by 328 votes to 170. New Clause 1 concerned parental involvement and accountability in cases of youth offending, specifically seeking an assessment of existing powers and recommendations for improvement in cases where children commit serious crimes. The result reflected near-total party discipline, with Labour and its Co-operative Party partners voting unanimously against and the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and Reform UK voting in favour.

Why it matters: The Sentencing Bill is a substantial piece of legislation designed to address a prison capacity crisis, reform short custodial sentences, and introduce new rehabilitation and supervision frameworks. New Clause 1 sought to add an accountability mechanism concerning parental responsibility in youth offending, prompted in part by high-profile constituency cases involving violent crimes committed by very young people. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds without that additional requirement. The broader Bill continues to advance measures including an earned progression model for release, intensive supervision courts, and an expanded prison building programme, all of which the government argues will both relieve overcrowding and reduce reoffending rates.

The politics: The vote followed strict party lines. All 311 voting Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs opposed the amendment, while 97 Conservatives, 65 Liberal Democrats, and 7 Reform UK MPs backed it, forming an unusual cross-party opposition coalition. Despite this numerical opposition bloc, the government's majority was comfortable at 158 votes. Plaid Cymru and the Greens voted with the government. The debate ranged well beyond New Clause 1 itself, touching on youth anonymity, sentencing guidelines, probation privatisation, child cruelty registers, and Crown Court sitting day caps, illustrating the broad political contest surrounding the Bill at its Report Stage.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/280 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
97 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
2 Aye/5 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Democratic Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Dr Kieran Mullan

Conservative · Bexhill and Battle

Opposed

Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.

Voted Aye

Liz Saville Roberts

Plaid Cymru · Dwyfor Meirionnydd

Questioning

Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.

Voted No

Mr Peter Bedford

Labour · Mid Leicestershire

Supportive

Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.

Voted Aye

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.

Voted No

Andy Slaughter

Labour · Hammersmith and Chiswick

Supportive

Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.

Voted No

Lewis Cocking

Unknown · Broxbourne

Supportive

Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.

Voted Aye

Related Votes