Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 20

On 29 October 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 20 during the Report Stage of the Sentencing Bill. The new clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, proposed introducing a child cruelty register: a formal notification and offender management system for those convicted of child cruelty and abuse offences, modelled on the existing sex offenders register. The clause was defeated by 311 votes to 182. The child cruelty register would have created a system requiring individuals convicted of child cruelty or neglect offences to notify authorities of their whereabouts and activities, in a similar way to the obligations placed on registered sex offenders. Proponents argued this would strengthen the monitoring of those who have harmed the most vulnerable children, helping protect other children they may come into contact with after release. The government opposed the amendment, preferring to proceed with the Sentencing Bill as drafted. The broader Bill itself deals with a significant overhaul of sentencing, including measures on short custodial sentences, earned early release, rehabilitation requirements, and prison capacity. The defeat of New Clause 20 means no such register will be created through this legislation. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 305 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the new clause. The Conservatives supplied 95 of the 182 Ayes, joined by all 65 voting Liberal Democrats, all 4 voting Plaid Cymru members, all 4 voting Greens, and 7 Reform UK MPs. Only one Labour MP voted in favour. The Conservatives used the Report Stage debate to press a series of amendments they argued would strengthen protections for victims and communities, while the government defended the Bill as a comprehensive reform addressing prison capacity and reoffending. The vote on New Clause 20 came on the same day as a related division on New Clause 1, which was also defeated by a larger margin of 328 to 170, suggesting consistent cross-opposition support for amendments and solid government discipline in resisting them.