Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 20
182Ayes
311Noes
Defeated · majority 129 · Government won156 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 182 · No 311 · DNV 156 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 29 October 2025 on New Clause 20 to the Sentencing Bill, which proposed creating a child cruelty register requiring those convicted of child cruelty or neglect offences to notify police of their whereabouts, identity, and circumstances, including whether they live with children. The system would have worked similarly to the sex offenders register. The proposal was defeated by 311 votes to 182. The practical effect of the vote is that no such standalone register will be created through this legislation. At present, those convicted of child cruelty or neglect offences are managed through probation and offender management frameworks, but without the separate notification requirements that apply to sex offenders. Supporters of the new clause argued that this gap leaves a specific monitoring tool unused for a category of offenders who pose direct risks to children. The government's position, resisting the clause, was that existing frameworks are sufficient or that the proposal requires further consideration before legislating. The vote split almost entirely along party lines, with Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens all voting in favour. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided virtually all of the opposition votes, with only one Labour MP recorded in the aye lobby. The new clause was brought forward by the Conservatives, inspired by the case of Tony Hudgell, a child who had both legs amputated after being abused by his birth parents as an infant. The vote took place during report stage of the Sentencing Bill, a wide-ranging piece of legislation reforming sentencing, prisoner release, and offender management across England and Wales.
Voting Aye meant
Support creating a child cruelty register to improve monitoring and management of those convicted of child abuse and neglect offences, extending similar notification requirements to those that already apply to sex offenders.
Voting No meant
Oppose the creation of a standalone child cruelty register at this time, with the government arguing existing probation and management frameworks are sufficient or that the proposal requires further consideration.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
273
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
32
10
Independent
—
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0