Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 12
82Ayes
314Noes
Defeated · majority 232 · Government won253 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 82 · No 314 · DNV 253 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on New Clause 12 during the Report Stage of the Sentencing Bill on 29 October 2025. The clause was defeated by 314 votes to 82. The debate took place alongside consideration of a large number of other new clauses and amendments to the Bill, covering a wide range of sentencing issues including rehabilitation, youth justice, child cruelty, road traffic offences, probation, and the treatment of serious offenders. The Sentencing Bill is the Government's central legislative vehicle for addressing England and Wales's acute prison capacity crisis, which media coverage has focused on heavily in the context of projections showing a prison population potentially exceeding 100,000 within three years. The Bill introduces an "earned progression model" for release, reforms to short-term sentencing, and new intensive supervision courts. New Clause 12 sought to add further sentencing reforms or protections beyond what the Government had proposed. Its defeat means the Bill continues on the Government's preferred terms, without the additional provisions the amendment would have introduced. The outcome reflects the Government's desire to keep the Bill's framework intact while resisting additions from opposition parties and backbench members. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Labour and Labour/Co-operative MPs voted almost unanimously against the new clause, with only one Labour member voting in favour. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of support, with all 65 of their voting members backing the clause. Smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and Reform UK all voted in favour, producing an unusual cross-party alliance on the "aye" side that spanned from left-wing to right-wing critics of the Government's approach. The Bill has attracted sustained opposition from Conservatives who argue it is too soft on serious offenders, and from progressive voices who want deeper rehabilitation commitments built into the legislation. A related vote earlier the same day on New Clause 1 produced a similar but larger defeat for the opposition, with 328 votes against and 170 in favour.
Voting Aye meant
Support mandating the government to re-sentence all remaining IPP prisoners within 18 months, providing a firm legal deadline to end a widely condemned form of indefinite imprisonment
Voting No meant
Oppose imposing a statutory 18-month deadline for IPP re-sentencing, preferring the government to work at its own pace to address the issue without binding legislative commitments it may not be able to meet
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
276
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
1
0
115
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
3
2
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,070 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,735 words) →
Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (619 words) →
Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (294 words) →
Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.Unknown · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (87 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0