Sentencing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 12

Wednesday, 29 October 2025 · Division No. 333 · Commons

82Ayes
314Noes
Defeated

253 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedPro Ipp Abolition(Yes)Pro Prisoner Rights(Yes)Pro Sentencing Reform(Yes)Government Discretion Over Statutory Mandates(No)

Voting Yes means

Support mandating the government to re-sentence all remaining IPP prisoners within 18 months, providing a firm legal deadline to end a widely condemned form of indefinite imprisonment

Voting No means

Oppose imposing a statutory 18-month deadline for IPP re-sentencing, preferring the government to work at its own pace to address the issue without binding legislative commitments it may not be able to meet

What happened: The House of Commons voted on New Clause 12 during the Report Stage of the Sentencing Bill on 29 October 2025. The clause was defeated by 314 votes to 82. The debate took place alongside consideration of a large number of other new clauses and amendments to the Bill, covering a wide range of sentencing issues including rehabilitation, youth justice, child cruelty, road traffic offences, probation, and the treatment of serious offenders.

Why it matters: The Sentencing Bill is the Government's central legislative vehicle for addressing England and Wales's acute prison capacity crisis, which media coverage has focused on heavily in the context of projections showing a prison population potentially exceeding 100,000 within three years. The Bill introduces an "earned progression model" for release, reforms to short-term sentencing, and new intensive supervision courts. New Clause 12 sought to add further sentencing reforms or protections beyond what the Government had proposed. Its defeat means the Bill continues on the Government's preferred terms, without the additional provisions the amendment would have introduced. The outcome reflects the Government's desire to keep the Bill's framework intact while resisting additions from opposition parties and backbench members.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. Labour and Labour/Co-operative MPs voted almost unanimously against the new clause, with only one Labour member voting in favour. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of support, with all 65 of their voting members backing the clause. Smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and Reform UK all voted in favour, producing an unusual cross-party alliance on the "aye" side that spanned from left-wing to right-wing critics of the Government's approach. The Bill has attracted sustained opposition from Conservatives who argue it is too soft on serious offenders, and from progressive voices who want deeper rehabilitation commitments built into the legislation. A related vote earlier the same day on New Clause 1 produced a similar but larger defeat for the opposition, with 328 votes against and 170 in favour.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
1 Aye/276 No

1 rebel: Apsana Begum

Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
3 Aye/2 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

1 MP voted against their party whip

What They Said in the Debate

Dr Kieran Mullan

Conservative · Bexhill and Battle

Opposed

Opposed to the Bill's early release provisions, arguing the data proves hundreds of serious violent and sexual offenders will be released earlier; criticises the government for ignoring amendment proposals and questions the legitimacy of the Sentencing Council.

Liz Saville Roberts

Plaid Cymru · Dwyfor Meirionnydd

Questioning

Tables new clauses 27 and 28 on probation capacity and devolution to Wales; requests government response on the implications of Bill measures for probation services.

Voted Aye

Mr Peter Bedford

Labour · Mid Leicestershire

Supportive

Supports new clauses 1, 14, 18, 19, 21 to increase parental responsibility, remove anonymity for serious young offenders, abolish the Sentencing Council, toughen sentences for sexual abuse and murder, and ban dangerous drivers for life.

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Supportive

Supports new clause 26 to prevent privatisation of community service and unpaid work, drawing on negative experiences with Serco; seeks government reassurance on probation matters.

Voted No

Andy Slaughter

Labour · Hammersmith and Chiswick

Supportive

Supports the principle that community sentencing should prioritise rehabilitation and prevention of reoffending through voluntary organisations rather than commercial profiteering.

Voted No

Lewis Cocking

Unknown · Broxbourne

Supportive

Intervenes to support new clause 14 (removing anonymity for serious young offenders), questioning the contradiction if government lowers voting age to 16.

Related Votes