A divisionDivision No. 92 · Tuesday, 28 January 2025· Commons· Pensions

Women’s State Pension age (Ombudsman report and compensation scheme): Ten Minute Rule Motion

105Ayes
0Noes
Carried · majority 105 · Government lost
541 did not vote
Aye107No2DID NOT VOTE · 541

646 Members · Aye 105 · No 0 · DNV 541 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 28 January 2025, the House of Commons passed a Ten Minute Rule Motion calling for the government to establish a compensation scheme for women affected by changes to the state pension age, in response to a Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman report on the matter. The motion passed by 105 votes to 0, with no MPs voting against it. The motion concerns women born in the 1950s whose state pension age was raised from 60 to 66, many of whom say they received inadequate notice of the change. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found that the Department for Work and Pensions failed in its communication of the changes and recommended financial remedies. The motion, if translated into government policy, would require the creation of a formal compensation scheme for those affected, potentially involving significant public expenditure. The women most affected, often referred to as WASPI women (Women Against State Pension Inequality), have campaigned for redress for several years. The vote was notable for what was absent as much as what was present. While 105 MPs voted in favour, 351 Labour MPs did not vote, and the Labour government's position on the motion was recorded as unclear. The Liberal Democrats led the charge with 62 Ayes, making up the largest bloc of supporters. Eight independents, eight SNP members, five Democratic Unionist Party members, and small numbers from the Greens, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and the Conservatives also backed the motion. The result reflects broad but thin cross-party sympathy for the WASPI cause, set against a government that has not committed to implementing the Ombudsman's recommendations.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to address the Ombudsman's findings and establish a compensation scheme for WASPI women affected by state pension age increases
Voting No meant
Oppose compelling the government to introduce compensation measures for women affected by state pension age changes (no MPs voted No)
§ 01Who voted how.105 voting Members · 541 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
11
0
350
Conservative and Unionist Party
2
0
114
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
0
0
42
Independent
8
0
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
1
0
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
1
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Stephen FlynnSupportiveAberdeen South
The government must establish a compensation scheme for WASPI women as determined by the Ombudsman; the current refusal breaks explicit pre-election promises and compounds historical gender-based injustices faced by these women.Scottish National Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,570 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0