Women’s State Pension age (Ombudsman report and compensation scheme): Ten Minute Rule Motion
105Ayes
0Noes
Carried · majority 105541 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 105 · No 0 · DNV 541 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 28 January 2025, MPs voted 105 to 0 to grant Stephen Flynn (SNP) leave to introduce a Bill requiring the government to respond formally to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's March 2024 report on women's state pension age, and to establish a compensation scheme for women born between 6 April 1950 and 5 April 1960. The motion passed unopposed under the Ten Minute Rule procedure, which allows any MP to seek permission from the Commons to introduce a Bill by making a short speech in favour of it. The Bill, if it became law, would compel the Secretary of State to lay proposals before Parliament within three months covering two areas: a formal response to the Ombudsman's findings on maladministration and injustice, including an apology and acknowledgement of responsibility; and a compensation scheme for the women affected by the pension age rises introduced by the Pensions Act 1995 and 2011. These women, commonly known as WASPI women (Women Against State Pension Inequality), argue they were not given adequate notice that their state pension age would rise from 60 to 65 and then 66, leaving many without expected retirement income. The Ombudsman had already found in March 2024 that there was maladministration and injustice, but the Labour government subsequently rejected paying compensation, prompting this legislative attempt to force its hand. The vote was effectively a show of cross-party frustration rather than a contested division. The Liberal Democrats supplied 62 of the 105 ayes, making them by far the largest bloc in favour. Eleven Labour MPs voted for the motion despite their government's position, while 350 Labour MPs had no vote recorded. Nearly all Conservative MPs, 114 of them, also had no vote recorded.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to respond to the Ombudsman's findings and set up a compensation scheme for WASPI women affected by state pension age increases
Voting No meant
No MPs voted against; the motion passed unopposed
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
11
0
350
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
2
0
114
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
—
0
0
42
Independent
—
8
0
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
1
0
Reform UK
—
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
1
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
The government must establish a compensation scheme for WASPI women as determined by the Ombudsman; the current refusal breaks explicit pre-election promises and compounds historical gender-based injustices faced by these women.Scottish National Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,570 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0