The topic lensIssue · 7 divisions tagged · 13 parties active

Veterans.

Support for armed forces veterans

Divisions tagged
7
This parliament
Parties active
13
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Plaid Cymru
67% aligned
Recent activity
7
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on veterans.7 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
+656% on-whip · 351 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-1535% on-whip · 110 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
050% on-whip · 72 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyInd
+555% on-whip · 39 MPs
IndependentInd
050% on-whip · 11 MPs
Scottish National PartySNP
+1464% on-whip · 8 MPs
Reform UKRef
-2327% on-whip · 6 MPs
Democratic Unionist PartyDUP
-347% on-whip · 5 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent veterans divisions.last 5 · of 7 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
2 Jul 2025Armed Forces Commissioner Bill: Motion to insist on 2A and disagree with LA2B and LA2C
Aye: Support the Government's broader whistleblower protections that allow family members to raise complaints to the Armed Forces Commissioner on behalf of serving personnel · No: Prefer the Lords' alternative amendment, which did not include family members within the scope of the Armed Forces Commissioner's remit for complaints
321160Yes
3 Jun 2025Armed Forces Commissioner Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
Aye: Support the government's position of removing the Lords amendment, keeping the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill in its original scope without additional legacy-related provisions · No: Support the Lords amendment, which would have added provisions — likely relating to Northern Ireland Troubles legacy matters — to the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill
321182Yes
3 Jun 2025Armed Forces Commissioner Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
Aye: Support the government's position: reject the Lords amendment and proceed with the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill as the government intended, establishing the commissioner to handle service welfare complaints · No: Support retaining the Lords amendment, preferring the Lords' modified version of the Bill over the government's original approach
316186Yes
3 Jun 2025Armed Forces Commissioner Bill: Government amendment (a) in lieu of Lords Amendments 2 and 3
Aye: Support the government's revised amendment, which strengthens the original Lords changes while establishing the Armed Forces Commissioner on a firmer statutory footing · No: Prefer the original Lords amendments as passed, or oppose the overall approach to the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill
328105Yes
21 Jan 2025Armed Forces Commissioner Bill Report Stage: Amendment 9
Aye: Support requiring the government to clarify how the Armed Forces Commissioner will coordinate with the National, Scottish, Welsh, and Northern Ireland Veterans Commissioners and related bodies within one year of the Act passing. · No: Oppose mandating a formal published coordination plan, trusting the government to manage inter-body relationships without a statutory requirement.
193340No

All 7 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on veterans is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where veterans money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Veterans” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 7 divisions