Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 30
77Ayes
390Noes
Defeated · majority 313 · Government won183 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 77 · No 390 · DNV 183 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 30, a proposed addition to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage. The clause was defeated by 390 votes to 77. The amendment sought to add provisions to the Bill beyond those the government had included in its own draft. The Sentencing Bill is a significant piece of criminal justice legislation affecting how courts in England and Wales impose and manage sentences, with implications for prison capacity and offender management. By rejecting New Clause 30, the Commons kept the Bill in the form the government preferred, blocking whatever additional obligations or changes the clause would have introduced. The defeat means those policy provisions will not become law unless reintroduced through another vehicle. The vote divided sharply along party lines. The Liberal Democrats provided the overwhelming majority of the Aye votes, with 65 of their members supporting the clause, while Plaid Cymru and the Greens each contributed 4 Aye votes and a small number of independents also backed it. Labour and the Conservatives both voted against, with 264 Labour and 86 Conservative members in the No lobby, reflecting a cross-bench coalition holding the government line. Notably, two Labour members broke with their party to vote Aye. The result sits within a broader pattern visible in related divisions: government amendments and opposition proposals to the Sentencing Bill have consistently been defeated at both committee and report stages in the autumn of 2025.
Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a new provision to the Sentencing Bill, likely restricting the use of short custodial sentences or strengthening presumptions in favour of suspended sentences
Voting No meant
Oppose the new clause, preferring the existing Bill approach to sentencing reform without this additional provision
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
2
264
95
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
86
30
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
24
18
Independent
—
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
1
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,517 words) →
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words) →
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (186 words) →
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0