Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 9
104Ayes
317Noes
Defeated · majority 213 · Government won224 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 104 · No 317 · DNV 224 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 9, an opposition amendment to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage. The amendment was defeated by 317 votes to 104. The government opposed the clause, and its majority in the Commons was sufficient to block it. The Sentencing Bill is the government's vehicle for reforming how custodial sentences are handed down and served, alongside broader changes to the prison system. New Clause 9 sought to modify or constrain elements of that framework. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to sentencing and prison reform proceeds without the changes the amendment's supporters argued for, keeping policy on the trajectory ministers have set out. The vote divided largely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative members who voted came down against the clause, while 90 Conservatives voted for it, alongside the five Democratic Unionist Party members, four Reform UK members, and both the Traditional Unionist Voice and Ulster Unionist Party representatives. Notably, four Green MPs and all four Plaid Cymru members voted with the government against the amendment, while five Independents backed it and seven voted no. The result is consistent with the pattern seen at the Sentencing Bill's later Report Stage on 29 October 2025, where a series of further opposition new clauses were also defeated by comparable margins.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring courts to publish offender nationality and immigration status data, arguing it enables better-informed policy on borders and criminal justice
Voting No meant
Oppose the mandatory collection and rapid publication of offender nationality/immigration status data, likely on grounds of practicality, privacy, or that it is unnecessary or divisive
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
—
5
7
1
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words) →
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words) →
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words) →
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0