Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 9
104Ayes
317Noes
Defeated · majority 213 · Government won224 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 104 · No 317 · DNV 224 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 9 to the Sentencing Bill, which would have placed a legal duty on courts to collect and publish sentencing data including the nationality, visa route and asylum status of offenders within 24 hours of sentencing. The clause was tabled by Dr Kieran Mullan, the Conservative MP for Bexhill and Battle. It was defeated by 317 votes to 104. The clause would have created a transparency requirement sitting alongside the Sentencing Bill's main reforms to short custodial sentences and prisoner release. Supporters argued that without reliable data on the nationality and immigration status of offenders, Parliament and the public cannot assess whether migration, visa and border control policies are working as intended. Had it passed, courts would have faced a 24-hour publication obligation each time they sentenced a foreign national offender, generating a running public record linking criminal justice outcomes to immigration status. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 90 Conservative MPs who voted supported the clause, joined by all five Democratic Unionist Party members, four Reform UK MPs and one Traditional Unionist Voice MP. All 277 Labour and 26 Labour and Co-operative Party members who voted opposed it, as did four Plaid Cymru MPs, four Green Party MPs and two MPs from Your Party. Five independents voted for the clause and six against. There were no Conservative MPs recorded voting against, and no Labour MPs recorded voting for it.
Voting Aye meant
Support a legal duty to publish sentencing data including offenders' nationality and immigration status, arguing that transparency about who is committing crimes is essential for evidence-based policy on migration and border control.
Voting No meant
Oppose the new clause, likely viewing it as unnecessary, operationally unworkable given the 24-hour publication requirement, or as an attempt to link immigration status to crime in a way that risks stigmatising migrant communities.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
—
5
6
2
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words) →
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words) →
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words) →
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0