A divisionDivision No. 322 · Tuesday, 21 October 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 6

167Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 146 · Government won
168 did not vote
Aye169No312DID NOT VOTE · 168

648 Members · Aye 167 · No 313 · DNV 168 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 21 October 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 6, an opposition amendment to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage. The clause sought to add additional provisions to the government's sentencing reforms, with supporters arguing it would strengthen or modify the existing framework. The amendment was defeated by 313 votes to 167. The defeat means the Sentencing Bill will continue through Parliament without the additional provisions proposed in New Clause 6. The government's original structure for sentencing reform remains intact at this stage. The vote reflects ongoing tension between the government and opposition parties over the scope and content of changes to the sentencing framework, which affects how courts in England and Wales determine punishments for criminal offences. The division followed strict party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the clause, while all 89 Conservative MPs and all 64 Liberal Democrats who voted supported it. Plaid Cymru and Reform UK also backed the amendment. The Democratic Unionist Party, Ulster Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice voted against. Eight independents supported the clause and two opposed it. The result reflects a broader pattern visible in related divisions on the Sentencing Bill at report stage in late October 2025, where similar opposition amendments were consistently defeated by comparable margins, suggesting the government held firm discipline throughout the bill's scrutiny.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding restrictions to the Sentencing Bill's suspended sentence reforms, ensuring repeat offenders convicted of the same offence cannot receive a mandatory suspended sentence in place of immediate custody
Voting No meant
Reject the amendment, backing the Government's Sentencing Bill as drafted and opposing Conservative-led attempts to carve out repeat offenders from the suspended sentence presumption
§ 01Who voted how.480 voting Members · 168 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
89
0
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
8
2
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0