A divisionDivision No. 322 · Tuesday, 21 October 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 6

167Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 146 · Government won
168 did not vote
Aye169No312DID NOT VOTE · 168

648 Members · Aye 167 · No 313 · DNV 168 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 6 to the Sentencing Bill, tabled by Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative, Huntingdon). The clause would have made lifetime driving bans mandatory for anyone convicted of causing death by dangerous or careless driving. The amendment was defeated by 313 votes to 167. The practical effect of the clause would have been to remove judicial discretion in sentencing for these offences and replace it with a statutory requirement for a permanent ban. Under current law, the minimum disqualification for causing death by dangerous driving is five years, and for causing death by careless driving just 12 months. Obese-Jecty told the Committee that across nearly 3,000 convictions for fatal driving offences since 2017, fewer than 1% of those convicted of causing death by dangerous driving received a lifetime ban, with the figure standing at just two in the previous year alone. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause. All 89 voting Conservatives and all 64 voting Liberal Democrats supported it, as did Plaid Cymru's four members and four Reform UK MPs. The Democratic Unionist Party, the Traditional Unionist Voice, and the Ulster Unionist Party voted against. Seven independents voted in favour and two against. The amendment was one of several opposition proposals considered during the Bill's Committee stage, all of which the Government opposed, reflecting a broader contest over whether the Bill's sentencing reforms were sufficiently tough.

Voting Aye meant
Support making lifetime driving bans mandatory for those who kill through dangerous or careless driving, arguing current minimum disqualification periods are far too lenient and fail victims' families.
Voting No meant
Oppose mandatory lifetime bans, preferring to leave sentencing discretion with judges rather than imposing a blanket statutory requirement regardless of individual circumstances.
§ 01Who voted how.480 voting Members · 168 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
277
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
89
0
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
8
2
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0